Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Bah! Gitzo.

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    523

    Bah! Gitzo.

    So I sent my Gitzo ballhead back for a repair (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._Ballhead.html).

    it took FORRREEEVEER to come back and its still kind've wonky (still wiggles and the ball slips even when its cranked down)

    I think I'd like to go back to a 3-way head but I'd also like it to be light. Suggestions?

  2. #2
    wmsey
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    11

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    I use both Pan (or three way) and ball heads on 4x5 and Canon 1D (so heavy enough). Although I exclusively used an Arca B-1 for years it would be hard to go back to that heavy a head. It would also be hard to "just" use a pan head.

    I mused about this last year: http://www.twentymillionthings.com/2...ht-ball-heads/

    The Gitzo Pan head is nothing special, up to the task but not exceptional - but it does just fine shooting buildings. The post I've referenced talks about three light-weight ball heads. I've developed a wrist issue after 30 years of setting things on Tripods and weight has begun to matter.

    And if you have a car to sell or don't mind a second mortgage: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...rca-cube.shtml.

    William
    Last edited by wmsey; 9-Apr-2012 at 20:16. Reason: No edits

  3. #3
    funkadelic
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Yadkinville, NC, USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    It depends on the camera, but without knowing that, I'd say a Manfrotto 405.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    108

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    Take it apart and clean it yourself!

    I have the big Foba Superball that gets "mushy" every few years. I cleaned it recently for the first time in about 4 years and it went from "mushy" (with a firm pressure required to lock it down) to rock solid with a flip of the finger. The cleaning also got rid of the starting friction when moving it from a locked position. It took a while because I was thorough. The Gitzo you have looks like it would be a lot simpler to do.

    You don't say what you are plopping on the head. Personally I would prefer a geared head to the Foba I currently have for LF because leveling a 4x5 on a ball head is a bit of a pain and I don't really like 3 way pan heads. For smaller formats the ball head is the best.

    I would love to get that Arca Cube.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    775

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    Friends don't let friends use ballheads for view cameras!

    Seriously, I hate them. They're amazing for small format cameras, or for shooting work where you don't care if the camera is level. They're also extremely solid when locked down. But it's difficult to level them in one axis without affecting the other. I used one at first when I switched to 4x5 and I was extremely glad to switch.

    It depends on your camera of course, but I have two favorites. The Manfrotto 410 is geared and extremely easy to use. It works great with 4x5 field cameras and maybe some larger cameras, but no huge studio monorails or 8x10s. For architectural or urban work it's a pleasure. The only real disadvantages are that it might not last forever, since I've heard the gears wear (but it's relatively affordable so you can always buy another). And I hate the Manfrotto QR system. The plate, when used the way I like to use it which makes the camera more centered over the tripod, interferes with the drop bed on my Technika. It's secure but I vastly prefer either no QR or an Arca-style system. Somewhere I saw an adaptor plate to convert the manfrotto to an arca clamp, so that would help. It bolts in place so it should be solid.

    My other favorite is the Linhof 3-way leveling head. I got it as a bonus when I bought my Technika and I've been using it most of the time since I got it. I do miss the gearing of the Manfrotto, but the Linhof is more solid, more compact and feels like it is made to a higher standard of quality. I like it for travel since it's not much bigger than a ballhead but just as solid. It also is a very simple design and it seems like not much could go wrong. I may get an arca clamp for it but now I use it without a QR. The only real downsides are the lack of gearing (but it's still easy to level the camera since each axis locks individually) and the price. New, they're about a grand, but they pop up used in the $300 range from time to time. Mine looks like it's been to hell and back but it still works perfectly.

    In a perfect word, I'd get the Linhof 3d Micro. But $2200 buys a lot of film...

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    523

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    I'm shooting with a Canham MQC 5x7 (6 lbs) and a 150mm Super Symmar HM (1.75 lbs). I cant imaging using a heavier lens.

    I bought the ball head with a focus on weight. As mentioned, I'd like to keep the weight down but I'd also like something that works. I don't think I'd need something that's geared but QR would be nice.

    Thanks guys.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    232

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    Definitely check out an Arca B-1 ballhead. I've used mine for over 25 years with various 4 by 5 view cameras, and with a quick release, always works flawlessly. I keep it clean, but thats all it requires. They come up used here occasionally. Mine weighs 1.75 lbs with the quick release.
    -Brad

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    Quote Originally Posted by Noah A View Post

    My other favorite is the Linhof 3-way leveling head. I got it as a bonus when I bought my Technika and I've been using it most of the time since I got it. I do miss the gearing of the Manfrotto, but the Linhof is more solid, more compact and feels like it is made to a higher standard of quality. I like it for travel since it's not much bigger than a ballhead but just as solid. It also is a very simple design and it seems like not much could go wrong. I may get an arca clamp for it but now I use it without a QR. The only real downsides are the lack of gearing (but it's still easy to level the camera since each axis locks individually) and the price. New, they're about a grand, but they pop up used in the $300 range from time to time. Mine looks like it's been to hell and back but it still works perfectly.
    Amen to that, it's the best head for a 4x5 field.

  9. #9
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    6,286

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    I have a Manfrotto 229, 329 and 3047; all three perform admirably and I wouldn't trade any of them for the slickest ball head ever made.
    Even the compact and lightweight 329 handles my heaviest camera (a TK45) easily.
    They cost me about $70 each.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olalla, WA
    Posts
    291

    Re: Bah! Gitzo.

    First off, opinions are like...well, lets just say we all have one. Personally I have had several 3-way heads, the last being the Manfrotto 808rc4. All the heads I have owned have worked fine. At present I am using a RRS BH-55. It is smooth, very solid and I have no problems with it at all. It locks down securely with little tightening. I use it for digital, medium format and 4X5.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 29-May-2011, 17:34

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •