Not quite, but close. Copyright law (in the U.S.) covers all tangible expressions (that is--whatever's actually written down), and the protections start from the moment of creation. The burden of proof and the available remedies vary depending on whether it is actually registered, but the principle is that if a person didn't create something themselves (which they presumably can know definitively), then they cannot assume that they can copy it. There are exclusions for fair use, but those don't apply here.
Leigh's point was not about what was a matter of law, but rather about what can actually be enforced. He's saying that enforcing U.S. copyright law on the internet isn't practical, and generally I think he's right.
There have been growing numbers of Internet web sites that scavenge all manner of content--auction listing, for-sale listing, store catalogs, forums, mail list archives, linked-in and business register entries, and so on--and consolidate them by subject onto their own page. Usually, clicking on them takes one back to the source, but often with a click-through ad or a cookie being installed in the process. When I click on such a site in a Google search, I back up immediately and take a different tack. This has been going on for a long time, and the systems for doing so are automated and often out of reach. We need Google and other search providers to do this enforcement--nothing else is going to get the job done, it seems to me. Individual forum owners wouldn't even know where to start, but once started, the job would be all-consuming, never-ending, and unsuccessful.
It is the policy of this forum that individual authors own their own words. If someone has appropriated something you wrote here, you can take action on your own against the site that did the copying, or you can prevent it by requesting that your words be removed from this site (though we can't always remove what has been quoted by others, and we certainly have no control over what has been scavenged). That choice has always been available.
In my own case, I don't put stuff on the Internet that would bother me to be copied, and I do take action when someone puts something on the Internet that makes public my personally identifiable information without my permission. I've had to do that even recently.
And one would think that bona fide sites that post copied information would respond to a cease-and-desist request without having to go through a lawyer. One would be wrong. Parts of an article I wrote, including a picture of me made by my wife (and with the bottom portion that holds the copyright watermark removed), have been part of an ebay buying guide for five years, without attribution and despite my several attempts to have it removed. It's the price we pay for having a public life on the Internet.
Now, copying LFPF posts on other forums without permission--that is a little easier to address if we have contact with the other forum's owners.
Rick "clear as mud" Denney
Bookmarks