Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Negative film - exposure or scanning?

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    46

    Re: Negative film - exposure or scanning?

    The thing about depreciating digital gear though is that even if it depreciates, it still does what it did when you bought it, at least until it fails. I have an old Canon 10D DSLR that is worthless now, but it still takes the same pictures, but of course, I don't use it! But if you have a digital back that gives you enough resolution for a large print and has plenty of dynamic range and whatnot, even if it is less valuable than a few years ago, it still takes good pictures, good enough for quality large prints.

    And with film, well, what good is that gear going to do anyone when film is no longer available? And how well will the equipment hold value when that happens? Black and white will probably be available in some diminished form, but I think the future of color film is very grim indeed. Has anyone researched the matter using Google Trends? All film related search terms are in steady decline. Some of it rose briefly and was bolstered a bit by the hipster trend of lo-fi analog photography, using toy cameras, old TLRs and the like, but if you look at Google Trends for terms like "lomography", "holga camera", "120 film", and so on, you see that the trend is over. And something interesting that I noticed is that searches for "digital photography" are on the decline. And searches for everything film related are on the decline. But "photography" is pretty steady. "DSLR" is on the rise. What this means, I suspect, is that film is so thoroughly dead that the "digital" in "digital photography" is becoming redundant, and so is being dropped for economy, so the phrase "digital photography" is less used. If that isn't a bad sign for film, I don't know what is!

    I'll be very surprised if we can get quality color film from the likes of Kodak or Fuji five years from now.

    This is an interesting Google Trend query:

    link

    And things like "compact digital camera" are on the decline because of smartphones. But DSLRs are hot. Interestingly, "digital camera back", "medium format digital", and the like are all declining. I'd suspect that this is because the resolution of DSLRs is becoming adequate for most purposes. Casual photography is done with smartphones. Most more serious photography is done with DSLRs.

    Yes, this is all sad commentary for the state of quality fine art photography. And actually, if you do some more Google Trends research, you'll find that everything art related is on the decline. Everything mobile computing and social media related is on the rise. What I find surprising is that almost everything music-related, aside from dubstep, has been steadily declining for years! How sad!

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    203

    Re: Negative film - exposure or scanning?

    Hi Everyone,

    Thanks for all the inputs. I got back to the scanning service and they said that they didn't think it wasn't impossible to clip highlights on negatives and that slides were easier!! They offered to re-scan, so I will send my negatives back. Funny thing is that the slide that was scanned by the same people looks fine to me.

    I'm aware that for me if I decide to stay with LF that the scanning will always be a key link between the pleasure I have taking teh image and being able to share that with others via a print/website etc. I'm attracted by the fact that this is a technology which will not be constantly upgrading, so I can invest in a few lenses, sort out the scanning and as long as there is film enjoy using this type of camera. If they stop making 5x4 colour film, I will use it for black and whites and get myself a panoramic back and little rolls of 120 film.

    I take Landscapes. I have a Nikon D700 and it's way overkill for the way I used it....manual focus prime lenses, nice and slow, but I got it for the full frame sensor. I will still use a digital for times when I can not indulge myself by taking time to use the LF camera.

    Cheers

    Graham

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    203

    Re: Negative film - exposure or scanning?

    Hi Folks,

    Well given more time at my computer I managed to get a decent image where the sky was not devoid of detail. Taken with Portra 160 on a relatively uneventful sunset, Chamonix 045N-2, rodenstock sironar n 135mm. Looking at it, would really have benefited from more sky and wider lens to get the sweep of the sea inlet in and also better posiitoning of the two rocks. Ah well, another time. Still, I like it quite a lot....something very soft about it, the quality of light? Keeps my interest going and encourages my experimenting with LF.

    Downsized for web display and not sharpened.

    Graham
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Blues-and-twos-hunstanton-l.jpg  

Similar Threads

  1. Scanning old color negative film
    By sanking in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8-Jan-2012, 01:59
  2. Fine grained color negative film in 4x5 with large exposure latitude?
    By l2oBiN in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8-Sep-2011, 12:38
  3. Scanning Color Negative Film
    By Hugh Sakols in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 3-Mar-2009, 21:00
  4. Best LF negative film for drum scanning?
    By Bill Glickman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8-Nov-2000, 10:36

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •