Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Deep orange cast

  1. #1

    Deep orange cast

    Hello everyone,

    I have just gone back to Large Format after twenty years away. I am a commercial photographer with nearly thirty years worth of experience, but, I am at a loss with a project and would really appreciate your collective expertise.

    I am currently trying to shoot on ektachrome 100 in the studio. The first polaroid came back with my calculated exposure for the lighting system - strobes with modeling lights as f13 @ 1/60 (I'm shooting on a Sinar F1 with a 210mm lens and behind the lens shutter) as being spot on, however, when the sheets returned from the lab they were massively underexposed with a deep orange cast - this I am familiar with in terms of a light/film error, so back to the studio...

    This time I took incidence and reflection measurements with a flash meter and ran exposure tests on both settings. Again, a deep orange cast and underexposed... Back again to the studio...

    This time I ditched the flash element, set my D3 up in 5x4 mode and recreated the initial fault. Progress, I thought, so I then gelled the lights to daylight, changed the exposure to a longer exposure based on a combination of incidence and reflection measurements with a light meter - ran a polaroid and it was fine. Spot on for exposure. So I committed two sheets to slightly bracketed exposures and they came back identical to the others - exactly the same deep orange cast and the underexposed, it was as if the gels were not there.

    So, have I got a bad batch of film? It is in date, but has come from Germany in to England and it has probably been scanned with some new x-ray or penetrating system. Could this be producing this ridiculously frustrating problem. Or, is it a duff lab?

    Your thoughts, experience and wisdom on this matter would be deeply appreciated.

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,380

    Re: Deep orange cast

    That happens when you load the film rear side out, exposing the layers in the wrong order and through the anti-halation backing. The coating does face you when the notches are on the upper right hand corner.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    5,360

    Re: Deep orange cast

    Now that is what I call a good answer (if correct)!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    775

    Re: Deep orange cast

    I'm afraid Sevo is correct, that sounds exactly like what happens when you load the film backwards in the holder. We've all been there, but usually it's a mistake you only make once...

  5. #5
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    5,012

    Re: Deep orange cast

    In case you loaded the film correctly, the other possibility is the lab; even the lab I used to go to was ok, but not as good as it used to be because they are letting chemicals sit idly for longer periods of time.
    I process colour at home now.
    If you depend on this lab for critical work, it would be a good idea to send them some test sheets at various exposures and see what's what.
    Search the forum for a no-fail method for loading sheet film.

    It does sound like you loaded the film wackbards, though.

  6. #6
    (Shrek)
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Deep orange cast

    Another vote for backwards film, I don't know what else could give uniform results like this. If the lab had bad chems, results would vary from different batches you sent. If they processed it as C-41 you would recognize the cross-processing look.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,116

    Re: Deep orange cast

    Yes, I've been waitng for the hipsters to discover this look. They've done just about everything else to bollix up their film except leaving it in a reactor core for a while.


    If the code notches are in the upper right or lower left corner, you're looking at the emulsion. Or, you would be looking at it if you were not handling the film in total darkness.
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  8. #8

    Re: Deep orange cast

    *slaps forehead* Doh!

    Thank you all. I shall rectify this problem and get down to it seriously. In my defense I can only say that it has been twenty plus years since having to think of such things.

    Again, thank you all.

  9. #9
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chillicothe Missouri USA
    Posts
    2,395

    Re: Deep orange cast

    Is the sync on your shutter correctly set to expose by flash? If not, the modelling lights could account for the orange underexposure.

Similar Threads

  1. magenta cast with E6
    By coops in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20-Dec-2010, 14:15
  2. Microtek F1 - cast in shadows?
    By Matus Kalisky in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 24-Oct-2009, 05:35
  3. QTRgui rip green cast
    By Fred Braakman in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 3-Jun-2008, 22:54
  4. fuji velvia 100 red cast ??!!???
    By thetooth in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 29-Feb-2008, 23:02

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •