Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 86

Thread: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    Perhaps Dan will oblige. Or Oren. Or someone German, they can pretend to sound authoritative even if they aren't... what is the best way, in English, to "formally" describe a len's aperture and focal length?

    For years I've been doing what most people do and writing "90/8" or "210/5.6". If I feel fancy I might use "210mm f/5.6". And I know that gets the information across. But please indulge me here. Should there be a slash before the aperture as though it is a fraction? Is "f/aperture" correct?

    Also is it "len's aperture" or "lens's aperture" for a single lens?

  2. #2
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    210/5.6 is good enough for me when talking to fellow photographers.

    The Rodenstock enlarging lens on my desk says: 1:4,5 f=135mm -- same for a couple Rodenstock view camera lenses.
    But I have another newer Rodenstock that 1:5.6 f=150 -- using a point instead of the comma (but 150mm f/5.6 on the box!)
    The Schneider says: 1:5,5/240 and another is 1:8/90
    Graflex says: f/4.7, then the serial number, then 135mm
    Wollensak says: 15 inch f/5.6
    Nikkor says:150mm 1:5.6 (also the same on the enlarger lenses.
    The Turner Reich triple convertible is just confused

    So I don't think one will find a standard way of denoting focal length and aperture!




    And it is the lens' aperture

  3. #3
    Preston Birdwell
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Columbia, CA
    Posts
    1,587

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    Frank,

    I will usually write something like this: 210mm/f-5.6 @ 1/30s, when I write anything at all.

    I have no idea if my way is 'technically' correct, but it gets the point across.

    --P
    Preston-Columbia CA

    "If you want nice fresh oats, you have to pay a fair price. If you can be satisfied with oats that have already been through the horse; that comes a little cheaper."

  4. #4
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    Hi Frank,

    The presumably "correct" way is to give the name of the lens and its aperture, followed by the focal length, as in
    Planar f/2.8 80mm. All the lenses I've seen for all formats show the aperture first, followed by the focal length.

    The reason is that Planar f/2.8 identifies the design. Designs can be scaled to different focal lengths.

    I normally do it the other way around, because anybody will understand 210/5.6. That's f/5.6 since f = 210mm.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  5. #5
    retrogrouchy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    832

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    You can do what you like with the numbers, but it's "lens' aperture".

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,804

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Petronio View Post
    ...what is the best way, in English, to "formally" describe a len's aperture and focal length?...
    The best way is the way that is understood by your target audience.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Petronio View Post
    ...I might use "210mm f/5.6"...
    That's the correct way.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Petronio View Post
    ...Should there be a slash before the aperture as though it is a fraction? Is "f/aperture" correct?...
    It is a fraction. When fully open, the aperture's diameter (in the case of your example) is 37.5mm, which is 210mm divided by 5.6.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Petronio View Post
    ..Also is it "len's aperture" or "lens's aperture" for a single lens?
    I've sworn off correcting grammar when intent is clear, but, since you asked, Vaughn and polyglot got it right: "lens' aperture."

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,653

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    "Lens" is singular.

    As Vaughn pointed out, various notations are used in practice to indicate the aperture. One advantage of the "f/" notation is that it's a nice reminder of where the number comes from. For a compound lens, at infinity focus, the entrance pupil diameter e, the equivalent focal length f and the relative aperture N are related by the formula N = f/e. If you turn it around, you have e = f/N. If you look at an aperture specified as, say, f/4, you're reminded that the entrance pupil diameter is equal to the equivalent focal length divided by the aperture number, in this case 4.

  8. #8
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    The colon is frequently used to indicate ratio, as f:5.6
    It means the same thing as f/5.6

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  9. #9
    Tim Meisburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Falls Church, Va.
    Posts
    1,811

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    Oren is correct. Lens is singular, and no possessive is either needed or wanted.

  10. #10
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,223

    Re: What is the correct way to express aperture and focal length?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Meisburger View Post
    Oren is correct. Lens is singular, and no possessive is either needed or wanted.
    I think it depends...if one is meaning, "The aperture of the lens", then it would be the lens' aperture. If lens is used as a description of the type of aperture, then it would be a lens aperture.

    If one is describing the type of hair, then it is cat hair (cat used as an adjective, I suppose). But if you are wondering whose hair it is, then it is the cat's hair.

    And the grammatical rule is that if a word ends in 's', the possessive is s' - not s's. Hope the grammar police do not raid my home tonight!

    Good night!

    Vaughn

Similar Threads

  1. Zoom lens focal length and back focal length relation
    By raghavsol in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 16-Mar-2011, 03:00
  2. Symmar-S // Componon-S rear element focal length & aperture?
    By Shutter in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Sep-2010, 16:02
  3. Calculating bellows extension/focal length at different focal distances?
    By BetterSense in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25-Sep-2010, 08:40
  4. Can I calculate focal length from aperture size?
    By DanK in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 5-Sep-2010, 22:07
  5. Aperture: diameter for given focal length
    By Nicholas F. Jones in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28-Jan-2008, 02:45

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •