Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: B&J Ajax Portrait - #2 vs #1?

  1. #1
    Scott --'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Penna., USA
    Posts
    1,227

    B&J Ajax Portrait - #2 vs #1?

    Anyone know the difference(s) between the B&J Ajax Portrait Petzval #1 and the (slightly longer FL) #2? I can't find any information on the numbering.

    Thanks,
    Scott

  2. #2

    Re: B&J Ajax Portrait - #2 vs #1?

    Here you go...1913 Catalogue page

    Dan

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ajax.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	77.2 KB 
ID:	79706

    Antique & Classic Camera Blog
    www.antiquecameras.net/blog.html

  3. #3
    Scott --'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Penna., USA
    Posts
    1,227

    Re: B&J Ajax Portrait - #2 vs #1?

    Perfect - thanks Dan!

  4. #4
    Scott --'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Penna., USA
    Posts
    1,227

    Re: B&J Ajax Portrait - #2 vs #1?

    Follow-up: I finally got around to mounting the lens on the 10x12. The catalog lists coverage at 5x7, which would be the optimal coverage, not what people are looking for these days. Truthfully I was pondering selling the lens before ever shooting it - always other priorities. But I popped this sucker on the 10x12. At portrait distance for an above-the-waist shot, it covers the format and swirls like mad. At head-and-shoulders distance, it covers with tons of room, and is smooth and creamy. At infinity, looks like it'd just about cover 8x10. For the time being, I'm keeping the lens, and cobbling together a lens board today. So if any of you ever happen across a B&J #2 Ajax, take a close look...

Similar Threads

  1. B&J Ajax - Funky aperture scale - ideas?
    By Scott -- in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 15-May-2010, 22:32

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •