Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Apple and Google go head-to-head over Kodak patent sale

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Petaluma, CA
    Posts
    1,536

    Re: Apple and Google go head-to-head over Kodak patent sale

    Quote Originally Posted by vinny View Post
    maybe kodak should do a poll here to see if anyone WANTS a kodak printer. They just don't get it.
    This is spot on.

    I bought an Aztek Premier right when the entire world (except for us LF'ers) was going digital. Smaller and smaller market. I'm an idiot.

    By the same token, if we keep going the way this trend is going, there might be more printers for a couple of years, and then people (consumers) will simply stop printing. They will look at their images on an iPad - or competitor's version of it - their phones and on their computers screens and tv's. Artists might print things up large, but our culture doesn't support the arts, so that market will get smaller and smaller.

    As for Ivan's comment, I'd love to see someone give Epson a serious run for their money. But I don't think Kodak has the brains...

    They're going down. It'll take a while, but you can't make that many stupid mistakes, for that many years, and survive.

    Lenny
    EigerStudios
    Museum Quality Drum Scanning and Printing

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,347

    Re: Apple and Google go head-to-head over Kodak patent sale

    Desktop printing shrunk by half between 2005 and 2012 I read in one of the Kodak reports in the Rochester paper. While printing will never disappear, most of the college kids I've met don't even own a printer, they can deliver their assignments electronically and so what else do they need to print?

    I'd imagine the high quality photo output devices are a small but stable market for Epson, and I am mostly happy with Epson after experimenting with HP and Canons, which were workable but had quirks. I have no compelling reason to want to experiment, I want to get 5 to 10 years out of an Espon, there isn't much room for a competitor like Kodak.

    I was feeling pretty good about how Kodak was handling bankruptcy and downsizing until the same article reminded me that Perez had Kodak buy back $5 Billion shares of their own stock in 2007. Back then they had a lot of cash. Dumb, dumb dumb.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    531

    Re: Apple and Google go head-to-head over Kodak patent sale

    Quote Originally Posted by DrTang View Post
    ever price those four or five bladed razor refills? I was shocked
    Yes! It's unbelievable. I tried a Walgreens one and cut my face on the first try. Other than an electric shaver or a straight blade it's pay the price or don't shave. So I decided to skip days when shaving isn't important. That look is in right now anyway.

  4. #14
    Mike Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    684

    Re: Apple and Google go head-to-head over Kodak patent sale

    Mike → "Junior Liberatory Scientist"

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    New River AZ
    Posts
    175

    Re: Apple and Google go head-to-head over Kodak patent sale

    As a weekend job my wife sells Canon printers at Best Buy and all the reps from Canon, HP and Epson laughed when I told them of Kodaks intention. Like a plane going down over the ocean -- there's gonna be wreckage and carnage !!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •