Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

  1. #1
    EOTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Linz, Austria
    Posts
    410

    E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

    Hi,

    Until now, I was using Fuji Hunt 3-bath kits.
    As they are no longer being produced, that makes me think about my future chemistry.
    I've got my Jobo ATL1000 up and running now alongside my Jobo CPE2.

    So I could switch to the Tetenal 3-bath or the Fuji Hunt 6-bath.
    I'm aware of the double amount of chemistry for 6-bath, but apart from this aspect:

    Two questions:
    1) How does the Tetenal 3-bath compare to the Fuji Hunt 3-bath?
    Is there any difference? Colors / Shadow+highlight detail / etc

    2) How does the 6-bath compare?
    What exactly does it do better?

    Best regards and thanks,
    Martin

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    grand rapids
    Posts
    3,851

    Re: E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

    6 bath has separate bleach/fix steps, not combined like 3 bath. All photo labs use 6 step and there's info already on the web why it's "better" so I won't misquote it. If you're lucky enough to get the fuji stuff, go for it. We don't have any more 6 step kits here in the states.

  3. #3
    EOTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Linz, Austria
    Posts
    410

    Re: E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

    Yeah, but in terms of actual image quality differences?
    Apart from the "the-pros-do-it-so-it-must-be-good" ;-)

    Like I think one improved aspect is improved lifetime / stability / preservability of the chromes?

    Are you sure, I guess this one must be available as well?: http://www.ag-photographic.co.uk/fuj...-5l-1758-p.asp
    Otherwise I think they would also send to the USA...

  4. #4
    EOTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Linz, Austria
    Posts
    410

    Re: E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

    Aah, here has been some discussion about the USA 6-bath availability: http://www.largeformatphotography.in...light=six+bath

    Advantages of 6-bath I found so far:
    * better pushability ( Source: http://www.apug.org/forums/forum40/2...h-e6-kits.html )
    * Fuji brand claimed to have potential better first developer (interimage, edge effects, stability) ("A" source see below)
    * 3-bath blix claimed to leave some more silver in the chrome which leads to more density/shadows ("B")

    A) Source http://www.apug.org/forums/forum40/2...h-e6-kits.html
    The E6 first developer is a high solvent, high acutance developer with special ingredients to promote good interimage, edge effects and stability. Many brands other than Fuji and Kodak do not use the same chemistry and suffer from a host of minor faults in the above characteristics. Some are severe and some are minor. All exist unless the exact method in the Kodak/Fuji formulas is followed.

    This includes a balance of pH, bromide and iodide as well as the use of Hydroquinone monosulfonate for proper development. If these are not used properly, development in the many layers is not correct.

    As for bleach then fix and blix processing, the blix for films is less stable and tends to allow for retained silver. A team of us spent over a year trying to develop a good blix for E6 and C41 and failed to do the job to our satisfaction although it yielded a lot of novel work and one patent. At present, I'm still trying to design a good blix and I now have one formula that works. It is not all that stable, but it works as well as can be expected when mixing an oxidant and a reductant.

    So, be careful and beware of blixes used for color film processing. I have read several threads discussing retained silver problems from such processes.

    PE
    B) Source http://www.flickr.com/groups/ishootf...7627682316710/
    nickrapak sagt:
    ...
    The problem with the blix is that not all of the silver will be bleached out properly with the blix. It's an inherent property of the chemicals used, and can't be solved by just leaving the film in the blix longer. The silver might be barely noticeable, but it does affect sharpness and resolution.
    Last edited by EOTS; 11-Jul-2012 at 09:44.

  5. #5
    EOTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Linz, Austria
    Posts
    410

    Re: E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

    Trying to summarize all the essential points here ...

    New points:
    six-bath E6 process is preferred because it is easier to correct for colour problems over the long term by adjusting the baths individually (timing and pH)
    Source: http://photo.net/film-and-processing-forum/00Mxm9

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Francisco, CA, USA
    Posts
    14

    Re: E6 Processing: Fuji Hunt 3bath VS Tetenal 3bath VS Fuji 6bath

    Quote Originally Posted by EOTS View Post
    Are you sure, I guess this one must be available as well?: http://www.ag-photographic.co.uk/fuj...-5l-1758-p.asp
    Otherwise I think they would also send to the USA...
    You are correct. I purchased two 6-bath kits from them about 2 months ago. Shipping took about a week, but it was smooth and I'm half-way through the first 5-L kit right now. Reminds me of the old Kodak 5-L kit.

Similar Threads

  1. C-41 Tetenal processing
    By gbr1000 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Oct-2010, 13:12
  2. C41 processing, Fuji chemicals
    By Seymour in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26-Jan-2008, 23:23
  3. E-6 Process, Tetenal 3-Bath, Jobo Processor and fuji slide
    By Brzeku in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 5-Dec-2007, 02:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •