Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Nikkor 135mm W Question

  1. #1

    Nikkor 135mm W Question

    I've got one of these & while it barely covers 5x7 @ f22 & above, I was wondering what I would have if I removed the rear element? More coverage, less, different focal length, or what? Thanks for any help!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,206

    Re: Nikkor 135mm W Question

    You will have a badly corrected longer slower lens with slightly more coverage. Actually I'm surprised a 135 will cover 5X7 and be sharp to the edges. Why don't you try it?

  3. #3
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,771

    Re: Nikkor 135mm W Question

    Last time I was out shooting 8x10 I took the front element off my 'modern' Fujinon-W 300mmm and the results were bad, being very un-sharp. It was worse than I had expected for a landscape. Maybe ok for a portrait?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,206

    Re: Nikkor 135mm W Question

    I'm going to guess that with just the front or the rear lens you'll have something around 235mm and a maximum effective aperture between f:16 and f:22. It is generally held that having a single element behind the aperture will work better.

Similar Threads

  1. Nikkor 135mm/5.6 question
    By scambug in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 20-Sep-2001, 13:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •