Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: It's official! Ink jet prints equal or surpass Eastman's dye transfer prints!

  1. #41
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,377

    Re: It's official! Ink jet prints equal or surpass Eastman's dye transfer prints!

    Really doesn't matter, Jay ... it's what works for him, and that's what's important. In this
    day and age, inkjets prints are the easiest route for most people. I prefer a more tactile
    darkroom route, which dye transfer is amenable to. But only a very small number of my
    images will be printed that way. The whole difficulty of forecasting permanence with either
    DT or inkjet is that there is no standardization of ingredients. Different dyes can be used,
    just as inks per se contain many ingredients and many paper variations - some of the inks
    actually contain dyes inferior to those often used in DT printing - so the long-term failure
    is premature color shift in part of the spectrum. This is an area when Aadenburg seems to
    have improved upon Wilhelm's studies. Back when I made a lot of Cibachromes I put samples up under all kinds of conditions, including abusive ones. I learned a lot more over
    those decades about the real world than any extrapolated fade test could provide.

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    3,020

    Re: It's official! Ink jet prints equal or surpass Eastman's dye transfer prints!

    Drew,

    I agree it doesn't matter.DT is gone, and IJ is here, for better or for worse. Whatever happens to any existing DT prints is not very relevant to any characteristics of IJ prints, and comparisons between the processes is a curiosity, at best.

  3. #43
    bob carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario,
    Posts
    4,943

    Re: It's official! Ink jet prints equal or surpass Eastman's dye transfer prints!

    I replied early in this thread , I like the look of dye transfer prints and as Drew points out about the bleeding and softness of Dye Transfer make them unique.
    That may be exactly what I like about them. This may hold true for the tri colour carbons that I want to make from the continuous silver film I am making. Many, including Charles Bergger have warned me that I will get bleeding of colour with a con ton film, and that I need a hard dot film to hold delicate colour fidelity.
    Maybe its not exact colour fidelity I am looking for.. Thanks Drew.

  4. #44
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,377

    Re: It's official! Ink jet prints equal or surpass Eastman's dye transfer prints!

    It's what I like about Vermeer versus the older Dutch miniaturists - he painted how vision
    felt. When I need tack sharp, I do polyester (Fuji Supergloss or prior, Cibachrome) - this
    is what some images need. DT has a whole different range of strengths as the Queen of
    color media, and carbon as the King perhaps. Each has a different look.

Similar Threads

  1. Archival stability of dye-transfer prints
    By chris jordan in forum Business
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 20-May-2012, 17:04
  2. Carbon transfer prints on aluminum
    By sanking in forum On Photography
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 20-Nov-2009, 11:05
  3. Newbie question: Big prints at home? Color prints?
    By BeginnerLF in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26-Apr-2009, 20:02
  4. Making inkjet prints from enlarger prints
    By coops in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2009, 07:07
  5. Are big prints just little prints made bigger?
    By Ed Richards in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 29-Sep-2005, 08:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •