Page 17 of 20 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 199

Thread: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

  1. #161

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southland, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,506

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Will it matter in 100 years? Will he get a major retrosective at MOMA in 2113?
    David

  2. #162
    Jonathan K. jcoldslabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,530

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay DeFehr View Post
    I'm sorry if I came off curmudgeonly--
    No need to apologize, at least not to me. I wasn't trying to refute your point so much as bring it home on a personal level. As someone who loves to use old cameras and oddball lenses I struggle with whether my images are interesting only because of the optical aberrations and expired film effects or if I am using those artifacts expressively in my work. I hope the latter is true since that is my goal.

    I spent my 20s chasing the Group f/64 ethic in my 4x5 work, everything sharp and tonally rich. It took me a while to figure out that I was doing this by rote because it had been presented to me as the way LF photography was done, reinforced by my reading and re-reading of the Adams trilogy of technical treatises (Camera, Negative, Print).

    My simultaneous discovery of the Aero-Ektar and expired films completely broke me out of that rut. Now, instead of photographing in a certain style by default my lens and film choices make much more obvious differences to the finished product. Of course, had I been paying more attention earlier I would have realized that my lens and film choices mattered just as much in my sharp, tonally rich days. But I hadn't thought of that until I began working in the opposite direction. Shooting with imperfect gear has made all of my photography better by heightening my awareness of technical aspects of the craft, even when shooting with lenses and film that make "mastery" almost impossible.

    Jonathan

    EDIT: Jay, I do like that wet plate example. It goes to show that a good idea is a good idea regardless of the way it is presented.

  3. #163

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
    Not always. You can paint a nice portrait on canvas with oils or you can paint some window frames.

    In the same way you can use photography to create a nice landscape or use it to illustrate how how to change a light bulb.

    They are both mediums and can be used for artistic and non-artistic (utilitarian) reasons but the medium is not the art.


    Steve.

    Please post a link to a wet plate photographer illustrating how to change a light bulb.

    I have addressed your objections days ago in a subsequent post btw.

  4. #164
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Isle of Wight, near England
    Posts
    658

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by RichardSperry View Post
    Please post a link to a wet plate photographer illustrating how to change a light bulb.
    What?

    Quote Originally Posted by RichardSperry View Post
    I have addresses your objections days ago in a subsequent post btw.
    What objections?


    Steve.

  5. #165

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Steve,

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Painting

    "In art, the term painting describes both the act and the result of the action."

    And

    "However, painting is also used outside of art as a common trade among craftsmen and builders."

    This is a discussion of art. Not house painting. I don't feel it is necessary, considering the context, to include known disclaimers and known exclusions. It is known and understood by all already that there is painting which is not art. I am not interested, as I stated in my previous post, to include them just to exclude them. (though, this is the second time I've done so).

    If you know of any utilitarian use(not art) of alternate photography processes which are completely mundane and utilitarian...that would be interesting. Post examples if you may, please. I need some house numbers on my curb, if you know someone who will collodion print them for me, I will take his or her number.

    And just for the next poster who wants to object to the known and obvious, I will state it clearly, there is painting which is not art and there is painting which is art. Clear enough?

  6. #166
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Isle of Wight, near England
    Posts
    658

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by RichardSperry View Post
    If you know of any utilitarian use(not art) of alternate photography processes which are completely mundane and utilitarian...that would be interesting.
    The only example I can think of is cyanotype which is closely related to the blueprint process for making copies of engineering and building drawings.


    Steve.

  7. #167
    (Shrek)
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    686

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by RichardSperry View Post
    If you know of any utilitarian use(not art) of alternate photography processes which are completely mundane and utilitarian...that would be interesting.
    PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards)? Preparing screens for Silk Screen printing, or plates/rollers for printing?

  8. #168
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Isle of Wight, near England
    Posts
    658

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jody_S View Post
    Preparing screens for Silk Screen printing
    Practically gum bichromate.


    Steve.

  9. #169
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    5,472

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Jay - so much of that kind of stuff was going around here locally in the 70's that it looks sterotypically artsy and predictable to me.

  10. #170

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    2,920

    Re: Is there such a thing as fine art photography anymore?

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    Jay - so much of that kind of stuff was going around here locally in the 70's that it looks sterotypically artsy and predictable to me.
    WPC images of robots/ robot parts? Really? I'd love to see some!

Similar Threads

  1. fine art photography
    By maurizio.gagliardini in forum Resources
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 22-Oct-2010, 19:37
  2. Forum on FA Photography. Is there such a thing?
    By Daniel Grenier in forum On Photography
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 3-Dec-2008, 09:24
  3. Digital Photography Workflow: Fine Art Photography
    By michaelezra in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-Jul-2008, 13:26
  4. What is fine art photography?
    By Leonard Metcalf in forum On Photography
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 26-May-2008, 04:50

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •