Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Sironar N as convertible?

  1. #1

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Does anyone know if one can expect good quality for color work from a Sironar N (the longer ones) used with a single lens cell? Is there any other lens that would make a decent and reasonably big 900-1000mm (36-40") when used that way? Would the quality beat that of, say a 600mm shot on rollfilm?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    1,905

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Does anyone know if one can expect good quality for color work from a Sironar N (the longer ones) used with a single lens cell? Is there any other lens that would make a decent and reasonably big 900-1000mm (36-40") when used that way? Would the quality beat that of, say a 600mm shot on rollfilm?

    --Paul Schilliger, 2004-02-03 02:00 AM ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

    These were not designed to be convertible lenses. All lenses have a front and rear cell. Part of their job is to correct problems caused by the other. When you remove the other you remove the fixes. This is why convertible lenses really never worked very well.

    Nikon makes a telephoto lens in the 600, 800, and 1,200mm range. The front cell stays in place and the rear one is changed depending on the desired focal length. There are Dagors and Artrs in the range you are looking for as well.

    steve simmons

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    France
    Posts
    151

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Paul,

    modern lenses are more complex in design. The different glass types are carefully in tune with each other. Removing one cell will e.g. cause severe chromatic aberrations. Anyway, it would be difficult to handle a bellows extension of 1 m. You might as well take an umbrella to catch the wind...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,330

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Hi Paul

    I will do a test in spring with my Sinar P and F together to get my 360 N only with front and also only with back elements. Will give me around 720mm I also will do the test with my APO Ronar 480mm but it will not be bevor May! But I let you know!

  5. #5

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Thanks guys, some good points.

    I was aware of the things you mentioned, but as a pragmatic guy, I always like to try it first or listen those who tried. The Sironars N are not designed to be used as convertibles, and although they are probably not usable on their entire field, maybe they would work decently on 4x5", knowing that the format will only use the sweet spot of the much wider field of the lens. Or maybe they would just produce a terrible image. I doubt nobody has tried. Bellows should be around 700mm for a 480mm Sironar front cell. Some modern lenses work quite well as single cells although they are not advertised as such. Armin, I have tried to use a Ronar cell, but they are no good at that. The Apo lenses such as Apo-Symmar are no good either, but thanks!

  6. #6
    Ted Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,465

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Sevewral years ago I was pressed into shooting my brother-in-law's wedding at the last minute. I did the formal shots with a 240mm Symmar-S MC. It was really was last minute and I was running like a chicken without a head. To make a very long story short I got fuddled and forgot to put the rear element back on the lens. Shooting with the front element only I got some fine results. My guess is that my focal length was about 360 or so. Resolution was fine for wedding work.



    Totallyunplanned and unscientific but it did work.

  7. #7

    Sironar N as convertible?

    I'm sure there could be some good surprises! If it works, the major draw back would probably be the T22 opening of the original f8,4 lens. Very difficult to work on such a dark ground glas without a bino viewer.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,330

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Hi Paul

    I tried the convertibel test with my Rodenstock APO Sironar N 360mm so the back element had a bellows lenghs of 42 cm at infinity and I had to stop down to f 11 for focusing because full open it was to soft so it could give a good portait lens! At f 16 it was usefull but behind a normal lens! Now the front element was so soft fully open and I got a bellows extention of 85 cm and at f 22 it started to get a bit sharper so not a solution for your dreams, but could be a good lens for "fuzzi wuzzis" as AA stated over the Softfocus lens users! So I use it again only as heavy 360mm for my 8x10 Sinar and almost in my studio!

  9. #9

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Hi Armin,

    Thanks for the report! I would have expected that poor results from an APO design. The same occurs with the Apo-Symmar line. They are very different lenses than the pre-Apo lenses such as Symmar-S or Sironar. Still if someone would try and report on using a Sironar post-convertible, but pre-Apo as a single cell, it could be interesting! Thanks!

    Cheers, Paul.

  10. #10
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Sironar N as convertible?

    Not exactly the question originally asked here, since this is a shorter lens, but I recently replaced the 135-235mm/f:5.6-12 Symmar convertible in my backpacking kit with a 135/5.6 Caltar II-N (Sironar-N), and just ran a test to see if it might be suitable as a convertible for a trip I'll be making with it in a couple of weeks. The rear cell alone is about 230mm, f:11. Wide open it's a portrait lens, but stopped down 2-4 stops it's not too bad. The optimum aperture, judging from what the image looks like with a 6x loupe on the groundglass is 3-4 stops from wide open.

    Here's a test on Type 55 (neg scan), EI 40, with the lens set at f:16-2/3 on the scale (so approximately f:32-2/3), 1/2 sec, no filter, on an 8x10" Sinar P with 4x5" back and a compendium shade. Detail is at 1000 ppi.





    For B&W a strong monochromatic filter should sharpen things up noticably.

Similar Threads

  1. 300mm Rodenstock Sironar-S vs. Sironar-N
    By Ralph in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 8-Sep-2009, 11:24
  2. 300mm APO Sironar-N versus 300mm Sironar-S
    By J. P. Mose in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 23-Mar-2005, 10:00
  3. Convertible lenses for ULF
    By e in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 3-Dec-2004, 03:55
  4. 150mm Sironar vs Sironar-N vs G-Claron
    By Edward (Halifax,NS) in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 4-May-2004, 10:36
  5. Convertible lens's?
    By Mando Morlos in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-Nov-2000, 20:37

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •