I have one of these little jewels ready to ship. Not your target focal length, but great fun, and very very tiny. Even shipping to Russia is under $20 I think.
I have one of these little jewels ready to ship. Not your target focal length, but great fun, and very very tiny. Even shipping to Russia is under $20 I think.
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949
http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com
A notable exception would be the 250/6.7 Fujinon W. In a no.1 shutter with 67mm filter size, so not quite as compact as a 240A or 250 G-Claron, but still way more manageable
than a typical plastmat that focal length, and really nice big image circle (covers 8X10).
It's actually lighter than some 210 plasmats.
If we're considering a 67mm filter as small enough, then we can include the 210mm f/5.6 Nikkor and (as others have mentioned) the 210mm f/5.6 Sironar-N.
Thank you all :-)
I just came a cross the plain 210 sironar lens . Any comments on that model ? Is it any good of a lens ?
Thank u
It's a Sironar-N, a fine lens. Not as much coverage as a Sironar-S, but a very nice lens.
Earliest Sironar, Non S, Non N, Non W from the late 1960's early 1970's can have delamination problems.
Originally Posted by Yef
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949
http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com
So in the end i got myself a Sironar - N 210 f/5.6 MC - it's just the compact size as i wanted and seems like a great lens
Let's see some examples.
I'm very happy with the size of the lens and the results of the picture - great lens
thank you all again for the help
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks