What does tone mapping actually do?
Does anyone have a 'before and after' photo to show tone mapping in action?
Thanks
What does tone mapping actually do?
Does anyone have a 'before and after' photo to show tone mapping in action?
Thanks
Tone-mapping is basically automated dodge-and-burn. It analyses the image in order to decide which bits to make brighter and which to make darker; the net effect is reduced total dynamic range without a reduction in local contrast.
Before & After is a little difficult to show because by definition, the Before image probably has more dynamic range (e.g. 12+ stops) than any affordable display device you might have access to (paper is about 5-6 stops, LCD/CRT monitors maybe 8, OLED and some plasmas can go slightly higher). You could render the Before at reduced contrast, but that's not really a good representation.
ex-Pic-A-Day (slowed after 2 years)
on flickr
Analogue Photo and Film FAQ (for APUG)
Open Source F/Stop Timer
Tone mapping is the process of mapping a tonal value to another tonal value. The resulting image may have the same dynamic range, a reduced, or an increased dynamic range.
In the context of HDR photography, tone mapping algorithms are used to reduce the dynamic range of an HDR image in order to be able to display the image on screen, or print it to substrates that have a lower dynamic range.
Note that any change of tonal values actually is "tone mapping", for example applying a simple s-curve or moving th contrast slider in Lightroom.
Cheers,
Andreas
To infinity - and beyond...
Hmm... interesting.
Anyone willing to show a high DR image retaining proper shadow detail while blowing out highlights... plus the same image with retained highlights but blocked shadows... plus a final image with tone mapping??
Christian Bloch's website 'HDR Labs' has some nice examples to show the results of different tone mapping settings in the context of HDR image processing:
http://www.hdrlabs.com/gallery/realhdr/
Cheers,
Andreas
To infinity - and beyond...
Thanks for all the replies!
So, tone mapping is all automated? It is not done by our input, the computer is the one that decides?
Look at Charles Cramer tech tip on Luminous Landscape for a tutorial on a type of tone mapping done manually.
Mike
Not at all. I can explain what I do with tone-mapping. I take a lot of trouble lighting and developing for a negative that has range of tones that would fit reasonably onto a medium contrast bromide paper. My scanner seems to be able to retain the end values, but the mid-tones are pretty flat and no amount of curve tweaking can breath true life into them.
So, in addition to the vanilla scan, I do two extra scans, one concentrated on highlight detail and the other concentrated on shadow detail. In Photomatix (photoshop can do it too, but with less delicacy), I merge the three scans and tone-map.
All the computer does is to MASK HIGHLIGHTS, SHADOWS AND MIDTONES so that you can blend in the better parts of each. There is nothing automatic about the procedure apart from feathering the masks. It is just as though you were doing the job under the enlarger with a burner or a dodger. Done with restraint, you get a file that looks like your original negative with no fuss. Tone-mapping is for descriptive, rather than expressive, manipulation.
Recently, I've done a lot of still-life with white flowers and deep shadows. These are 8x10s
Depends on the software you use. Generally they have a range of adjustability from "full auto" to "tweak ALL the parameters", not to mention there are many tens of different automated algorithms for tonemapping; they all work and look different.
I strongly suggest you go get a demo version of something like Photomatix (note it's not "Photomatrix") and give it a go. Trying it will give you way more info than a bunch of noodling on a forum.
ex-Pic-A-Day (slowed after 2 years)
on flickr
Analogue Photo and Film FAQ (for APUG)
Open Source F/Stop Timer
Bookmarks