Note that a weak spot in 8x10 is the 180mm range (equivalent to 90mm on 4x5, which is a very commonly used focal length). There are some older reasonably priced 190mm lenses, some fairly modernish 200-210mm lenses -- and even here, the 210/9 Kowa and Computars are wallet-openers, and some very expensive modern 200-210mm lenses that are heavy. I was looking into that focal length, but decided to forgo it for now and stick with what I have, explore some different points of view.
Ultra Wide
90/4.5 Nikkor-SW -- not an 8x10 lens, but like all lenses it covers more the closer you focus. Even focusing less than 4 feet away, it didn't quite cover the corners, and using it was a PITA because I had to aim the camera down and tilt the lens and rear standard back, to avoid getting the camera bed in the view. I will sell this.
110/9 Goerz Dagor -- Barely covers 8x10 stopped down.
120/8 Nikkor-SW -- an excellent lens. Just covers 8x10 at f/22.
I live in the Rochester area, and for my eye, there aren't many shots that mandate these ultra-wide views. I will experiment with the 120/8 and 110/9, but am not sure if I'll keep them.
Moderately Wide
240/9 Fuji A -- light, sharp, and converts to ~480/18 by removing the front element. Bruce Wehman highly recommends this lens. With a Wehman 8x10, the lensboard it is on can be reversed and it can be stored with the camera folded up. This will become a new standard for me.
Long
610/9 APO-Nikkor -- very very sharp lens
600/9, 800/12, 1200/18 Nikkor-T convertible set -- the rear elements can be swapped out to change the focal lengths. This is a great set, even the 1200mm lens is very sharp from my first shot with it.
I will compare the 610/9 vs. the Nikkor-T set some day and post results.
Bookmarks