Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

  1. #1
    Kelly Beard
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    16

    Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    So........

    I accidentally bought a lens I didn't need to, a Fujinon-W 210mm. I'll cut to the chase, which is the better lens? Both lenses have a max shutter speed of 1/400, the Caltar-S goes to f/45, the Fujinon-W, f/64. The Caltar-S says and looks like its multicoated, the Fujinon-W, doesn't and doesn't.
    Kelly Beard

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    I'd keep the Fujinon-W.

  3. #3
    Is that a Hassleblad? Brian Vuillemenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Marin County, California
    Posts
    837

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    Never used a Fujinon 210, but I have the Caltar II-S 210, and it's the sharpest lens in my collection. Even sharper than the Apo-Sironar S 150 and SS-XL 110. Bought it for about $200 on E-bay, by far the most bang for the buck I've ever got out of a lens...
    Brian Vuillemenot

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    I have a Calter-S ll 210mm f/5.6 lens around here. It appears to be the same lens as my Schneider Symmar-S 210mm f5.6 lens. Both lenses are indeed multicoated and labeled as such.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    373

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    Brian makes a good point. I would take a few photos in duplicate, one with each lens, and see which one you like more.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    I also own a Fujinon 250mm f/6.7 single coated lens. It is also sharp. If you really want to know the difference you need to do as Tony suggests and test them against each other. However, unless one is just a dud I doubt you will see any real difference in sharpness, maybe a very slight color difference.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rondo, Missouri
    Posts
    2,125

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    Caltar S-II is an exceptional lens.It has a 294mm image circle, so on 4x5 you should be able to tie the camera in knots and get get adequate coverage.

    The Fujinon W came in two different models. The older style has a 352mm image circle and will cover 8x10 with ease. The newer version (depending on whose reference you follow) is either 295 or 300mm. Either way, for 4x5, image circle won't be an issue. I've shot with both lenses and suspect that for B&W work, you won't be able to discern much difference. If you shoot color, the Fuji is likely to render colors slighly warm compared to the Caltar.

    Do what I'm going to do this weekend. I'm taking two 150's out with my 4x5 and I'm going to shoot only with 150. Every time I set up a shot, I'm going to shoot it with both lenses. I will take copious notes and store them inside of the ziplock back for each film holder so I know what film holder went with what lens. When I get home, I am going to process each set one at a time and store the dried negatives from one lens before I even start process those from the other. That way the negatives won't get mixed up. After printing them I should know which lens to keep.
    Michael W. Graves
    Michael's Pub

    If it ain't broke....don't fix it!

  8. #8
    MIke Sherck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Elkhart, IN
    Posts
    1,312

    Re: Caltar-S II 210mm vs. Fujinon-W 210mm

    I have both 210mm Fujis -- the older one with the 352mm image circle and a newer, multi-coated one. The older lens serves as a wide angle for 8x10, the newer lens is used for about half my 4x5 photography (all B&W). The newer lens has a touch more contrast but both lenses perform brilliantly in sharpness and contrast and provide equally smooth tones. I doubt you could go wrong with either of your lens choices.

    Mike
    Politically, aerodynamically, and fashionably incorrect.

Similar Threads

  1. Questions about Caltar 210mm f6.8
    By Robert Glieden in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 3-Jan-2013, 23:29
  2. Caltar II - N 210mm vs schneider Symmar-S 210mm
    By mentalcrisis00 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 1-Nov-2010, 13:40

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •