Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 117

Thread: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

  1. #101
    8x10, 4x5, ..., Tessina
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    4,222

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Quote Originally Posted by photobymike View Post
    A big help would be if the buyer could do some do-diligence in researching the seller.
    How are you supposed to do that if they won't allow negative comments.

    There's no forum on the site where such discussions would be appropriate other than in the Classifieds.

    (BTW, it's an AD, short for advertisement, not an ADD.)

    - Leigh

  2. #102

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    820

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    You ALL SUCK. My comments will DESTROY YOUR reputations. I'm angry with one tiny deal we did and the overall picture doesn't matter. I'm the seller and F-- all of you buyers cuz' I'm gonna destroy anyone who spouts a single negative word against me. You angry buyers are all DEAD... ALL of you. I'm gonna sell you CRAP and you can't do ANYTHING ABOUT IT NOW. Ha, ha, ha, ha.... hah, hah, hah!!!!!!!!

  3. #103

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    3,831

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Have another drink, amigo.

  4. #104

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    820

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    ^^^ You're already three behind me.

    And... I sympathize with both sides because I've been on both sides... many times.

  5. #105

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    3,831

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    LOL. How did you know?

  6. #106

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    820

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianShaw View Post
    LOL. How did you know?
    Due to your wisdom. How else would I know?

  7. #107
    falth j
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Above the Straits
    Posts
    145

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Reference:

    POST #3

    30-Mar-2012, 21:00




    “Amazing how the collective morals have declined.”




    And along the same line of thinking:


    A consensus means that everyone agrees to say collectively…


    what no one believes individually,


    or has the courage to be the lone voice saying his mind pursuant to an opposing viewpoint ”



    Therefore, we have consensus builders.


    People, who individually will not, or are unwilling to take blame,



    but as a committee, they will say almost anything,


    knowing full-well, the committee as a whole,


    is virtually blameless, because it is policy by consensus!

  8. #108

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    5,139

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Actually, that is about 180 degrees from what a consensus is.

  9. #109

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    2,916

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    Actually, that is about 180 degrees from what a consensus is.
    A consensus means that everyone agrees to say collectively…what no one believes individually

    I don't know for certain, but that line smacks of H.L. Mencken

  10. #110

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    5,139

    Re: New FS rule seems to claim its first victim

    Robert Heinlein, the Sci-fi author, also sounds like this (Stranger in a Strange Land became a bit of an embarrassment for him later on), though I enjoyed his fiction. Mencken does seem like an interesting fellow...sort of a Mark Twain of his time.

Similar Threads

  1. Bruce Barnbaum’s claim — 20 months later
    By Heroique in forum On Photography
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 4-Nov-2009, 11:06
  2. What's in the box? Another Efke victim...
    By muskedear in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2-May-2007, 15:10
  3. The one third into the scene rule
    By Leonard Evens in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27-Jul-2006, 06:52
  4. Another victim - AGFA in Chapter 11
    By Juergen Sattler in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 29-May-2005, 03:11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •