Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64

Thread: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by vinny View Post
    For a hobbyist like myself, it's a big expense. I don't rent cars or book hotels. I prefer to shoot both color and b+w and when I moved up to 8x10, it was expensive but now it's $13/sheet for color plus developing, which I do myself. Man, when I got into 8x10 Arista 125 (ilford fp4) was $37/box. It just won't be doable once my stash of film runs out. It's hard enough justifying (to my wife) how much time/space I take up with this moneypit I call photography. I'd rather not change my methods but we're being forced to.
    Photography was always - except for a very brief period - a hobby for the wealthy.

    Eastman pushed consumer photography to the masses with "special occasion" marketing. The Kodak moment like graduation, baby's first birthday, big deals in people's life to remember and make it worth spending those few extra bucks.

    The idea of constant use like a hobbyists was out of reach for the average person.

    The golden age in the '80s and '90s was unusual.

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    565

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    I don't know if price increases are good. I understand the manufacturing end of it, as far as cost, but if sales drop even more because of the increases, that can't be good. I am not a pro so I don't earn a living from photography,but if I did, the last thing I would want is increases in film cost. Even as a hobbyist, my hobby has to fit into the family budget. My film sits next to the bacon in the fridge.

  3. #33

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    grand rapids
    Posts
    3,069

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    very true. 99% of my equipment is used and wouldn't have been affordable had tons of lf/darkroom gear not been available online.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Batchelor View Post
    Photography was always - except for a very brief period - a hobby for the wealthy.

    Eastman pushed consumer photography to the masses with "special occasion" marketing. The Kodak moment like graduation, baby's first birthday, big deals in people's life to remember and make it worth spending those few extra bucks.

    The idea of constant use like a hobbyists was out of reach for the average person.

    The golden age in the '80s and '90s was unusual.

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    1,455

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Batchelor View Post
    Photography was always - except for a very brief period - a hobby for the wealthy.

    Eastman pushed consumer photography to the masses with "special occasion" marketing. The Kodak moment like graduation, baby's first birthday, big deals in people's life to remember and make it worth spending those few extra bucks.

    The idea of constant use like a hobbyists was out of reach for the average person.

    The golden age in the '80s and '90s was unusual.
    There wasn't much of an internet presence in the 80's and for much of the 90's for sharing photos, and sharing for information on forums like this one. Very few hobbyist photos ever got viewed outside of one's immediate circle of friends/family.

    There are billions of photos being taken each day, and posted on line each day from cell phones, point and shoots, and D-SLRs. It may not meet your definition of hobbyist, but one can make a very strong case that the golden age of photography is happening this very instant.

  5. #35
    Large format foamer! SamReeves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pacific Grove, CA
    Posts
    1,050

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    Inflation, it's here!

  6. #36

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    grand rapids
    Posts
    3,069

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    yeah, for the second time in three months!

  7. #37
    Scott Walker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Okotoks (rural), Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    950

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Lee View Post
    Brian Kosoff wrote here, a while back, a very compelling list of expenses for a photographic outing.

    As I recall, meals, lodging and fuel were far more expensive than film. If we consider car rental and/or air tickets, the price of film dwindles to relative insignificance.
    This is very true Ken and as much fun as it is to grumble about Kodak raising prices, film really is cheap in the grand scheme of things.

    I have been an employer rather than an employee most of my life so it is somewhat second nature to keep a fairly close eye on costs and contributory values of things.
    I use my truck for business and know almost to the penny what it will costs me to put every mile on it. In fuel alone I'm looking at $125.00 +/- worth every 5 1/2 hours of driving.
    If I go on a 5 day photo trip to say the Kootenays (which I do fairly regularly) I will incur costs directly related to the trip of about $1,980.00 plus whatever film I use.

    I do tend to use up way more film than most people and have been made aware of this by anyone I have ever gone out photographing with, so I may not be a good example.

    If the light is good and the weather cooperates I will use 50 sheets of Ilford 8x10 in the 3 days I have to shoot (the other 2 being travel days).
    So my film cost is about 11.2% of the total cost of the trip, it would be about 18.5% if I was using Kodak film and if I was normal and didn't use 5 times as much film as most people my numbers would be 2.46% using Ilford film and 4.34% using Kodak film. This amount is hardly significant as far as I am concerned for a photo specific trip.

  8. #38

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    "Photography was always - except for a very brief period - a hobby for the wealthy. "

    Maybe for advanced hobbiests but it was definately for the masses. Apparently you never shot with a Kodak Brownie 127 or 620 during the 50s and 60s or a disk or Instamatic later on. When I started in retail in the 1957 we charged $0.99 for developing color roll film. If we had had to rely on the wealthy then the store would never had survived and been sold to the May Co.

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    91

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    We should all remember that silver (sort of an important ingredient) has probably quadrupled in price recently, so comparisons to the 1990s are probably not fair. I'm not defending Kodak, I'm just sayin'..........

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    998

    Re: Kodak increasing film prices by 15%

    THAT'S IT!!!! Kodak has finally pushed me over the edge. In order to ensure Kodak gets the message as to just how upset I am, I will absolutely, positively, never, ever, ever, ever again buy any Kodachrome. There Kodak, I hope you've learned your lesson!

Similar Threads

  1. Old Film Prices?
    By NER in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 7-Mar-2012, 16:24
  2. Kodak drops prices on sheet film! 50 sheet boxes are back!
    By John Kasaian in forum On Photography
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 8-Apr-2011, 12:06
  3. Film Prices
    By jeroldharter in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 21-Feb-2011, 07:22
  4. Calumet b&w film prices?
    By John Cook in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 3-Aug-2005, 10:16
  5. film prices
    By Dan Dozer in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 22-Dec-2004, 06:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •