Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: 8x10 enlargement problem

  1. #11
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,400

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    You can do a print with the negative out of the carrier to see the defect in illumination better. But I'd probably just open up the mixing box. I'm curious as to what is inside, post a picture.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    lake worth, FL
    Posts
    120

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    I opened everything up and it still seems OK to me?

    photo 1 mixing box with camera flash
    photo 2 diffuser held up to ceiling light (there is a crack in the upper left corner that someone taped, but would not seem to be causing the problem)
    photo 3 looking up with lights off
    photo 4 looking up with lights on

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	15.2 KB 
ID:	69233
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	9.2 KB 
ID:	69234
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	17.1 KB 
ID:	69235
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	9.1 KB 
ID:	69236

    Funny thing is, the problem seems to be gone. When I put everything back together, and turned the light on, I can not see the line anymore. I am going to go make another print now.

  3. #13
    Printmaker Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    2,592

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    It's those pesky gremlins!!

  4. #14
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,400

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    Hmm.
    How are you processing prints that big? Could that light strip be from under development?

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    lake worth, FL
    Posts
    120

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    hey ic, I think you are right. I am roll developing the prints in a tray, which is my first attempt at that. I guess I was just consistently developing the prints enough to reproduce the line - seems unlikely but nothing wrong with mixer/diff - and its gone. not sure, I have to practice I guess. I printed 4 tonight, and this was the best developed....hard line is gone, but there are still some spots, presenting as vertical almost like long inkdots.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	41.4 KB 
ID:	69243

  6. #16
    bob carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario,
    Posts
    2,131

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    Ok so this is making sense now..

    How much developer are you using, when I roll big prints I am using over 35 litres of develper. the idea is to fully immerse the roll, and start rolling under chems, this allows even dispersion of chemicals in the first 15-25 seconds of development...

    If this sounds like a lot of chemsitry and cost, you must consider the cost of each 30x40 piece of paper being put in the round filing drawer due to uneven development.
    I just bite the bullet, save up a days of printing and get on with it.

    I use oversize trays, or I use under the bed Home Depot storage containers which hold a ton of chemistry.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    lake worth, FL
    Posts
    120

    Re: 8x10 enlargement problem

    my trays only hold about 3 gallons of chems. They are 30x32 inches. And only about half of the roll is immersed at any given time. So I have been starting by putting half the print completely under and immediately pulling the rest through the developer, then start rolling. I diluted my developer to extended my development time to about 2.5 min. I tried pre wetting the print and putting in developer already rolled but this was the worst of the bunch. I figured I would burn a roll of paper at least getting the hang of this.

Similar Threads

  1. 8x10 poor man's enlargement
    By fsibold in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 13-May-2011, 17:25
  2. choosing a 8x10 BW film for big digital enlargement
    By archivue in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2011, 11:52
  3. 8x10 to 16x20 enlargement
    By John Jarosz in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-Jan-2010, 10:56
  4. Printing - change from test strips to 8x10 enlargement
    By Simon Rodan in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 5-Sep-2001, 12:04
  5. What size enlargement requires 8x10?
    By Ric Raymond in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 5-Mar-1999, 15:33

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •