Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    20

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt View Post
    The agfa only does hi-res down a narrow strip in the middle of the platen.

    A bunch of us are working on a DIY design using a dslr to scan film in small bits and stitch them together. So far the results are promising. See: http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=84769&page=11 Posts #105 and #108.

    See also Rick's test at: http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=84769&page=17 post #170.
    __________________
    Sounds interesting, but I couldn't open the links for some odd reason. I'll try to search it out after dinner. Thanks! John

  2. #12
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Hm. Sorry about that. I'll try again:

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=84769&page=11
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    20

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt View Post
    Hm. Sorry about that. I'll try again:

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=84769&page=11
    Pete,
    I'm impressed! This looks really good and I pretty much have everything I need. John

  4. #14
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    That's great, John. Give it a try and let us know how well it works for you.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    My Microtek i900 does a great job. The i1800 does a superior job.
    I have not seen an Epson which would hold a candle to either one.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    20

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Noel View Post
    My Microtek i900 does a great job. The i1800 does a superior job.
    I have not seen an Epson which would hold a candle to either one.
    I had read that a "good" Microtek scanner can do some amazing things, but never ever thought I'd own or buy one. Well, I thought wrong! I contacted a friend that lives about 125mi away and ask him to be on the look out for a scanner that I could use for scanning some of my 8x10 film with. I figured he might have a lead on something since he's a camera/photo nut too. He emailed me a couple of days ago and said he had a Epson 1600 scanner he would give me, but it might need a little work. I said great and it's worth a try fixing it. He just emailed me again this morning and said he was giving me the Epson 1600 and he had a "like new" Artiscan M1 that he almost never used and I can have that one also. I'm still in shock, but extremely happy. Oh, he also said he'd drop it off at the middle of next week so I don't even have to go get it. You can't beat that with a stick! I'm sure I'll be back here getting some tips on how to run the thing. John

  7. #17
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Nice score, John!
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    20

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt View Post
    Nice score, John!
    Yes, I certainly wasn't looking to get by this cheap. I suppose I should take him out for a bite to eat when he gets here. I've done a few favors for him so I think this might be just a little pay-back. Still darn nice of him and I really appreciate it. John

  9. #19

    Re: Scanning 8x10 B&W film

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Noel View Post
    My Microtek i900 does a great job. The i1800 does a superior job.
    I have not seen an Epson which would hold a candle to either one.
    Not something I needed to hear...LOL)!!! I donated my i1800 because it was sitting around too long with me thinking along the lines of the "pros" on this forum saying it's either drum or high end flatbed, or go home. I was thinking, I don't care to have a proofing scanner since I like KISS principle and do the scan, be done with it sort of thing.

    I was going to say for the OP to send the film to the place across the boarder (West Coast?). It has been a long time, but no, it's not a scan, but what they do is use an enlarger to make very beautiful 16X20's at a very reasonable price. The person that referred me said the quality was the best he has seen from anything and I know that this same place does all sorts of high end drum-enlarging-even graphic arts, etc. stuff, but the main front man in charge knows his stuff when it comes to this very important area-printing, where, well, if 16X20 is all the OP needed for some of his negs, would be well worth seeking out.

Similar Threads

  1. Choosing an 8x10 film
    By David de Gruyl in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 9-Feb-2010, 22:59
  2. Epson 4990, 8x10 film, best method?
    By Daniel_Buck in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2008, 11:48
  3. Depth of Field, Depth of Focus, and Film Flatness
    By robc in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2006, 14:44

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •