Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

  1. #1
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    5,988

    Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    I read that we can remove the rear portion of a (for example) plasmat lens, and get something akin to an old-fashioned portrait lens.

    I've tried it with a Sironar, and something happens, that's for sure.

    To determine the new focal length of this lens, we can focus at infinity and measure the bellows draw.

    How do we determine the new f/stop ?

    Example: let's say a 150mm f/5.6 lens becomes a 300mm lens. It is now 2x the length.

    Does that mean that instead of being f/5.6, it is effectively f/8 (1 stop less) ?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Milford Pa.
    Posts
    2,886

    Re: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    yep. that should get you real close.
    My YouTube Channel has many interesting videos on Soft Focus Lenses and Wood Cameras. Check it out.

    My YouTube videos
    oldstyleportraits.com
    photo.net gallery

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    BANNED in the USA!
    Posts
    455

    Re: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    if the measureed focal length is correct then your method is sound if you have use the front cell mounted in the front of the shutter...if you put it in the back, then there may be a slight difference...but considering the method for measuring focal length, it will be close enough for government work

  4. #4
    funkadelic
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,248

    Re: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    The calculation of "f-stop" is a ratio of focal length to aperture. If the the focal length changes, the "f-stop" value changes also.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,205

    Re: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    As cdholden pointed out, that relation would be plain wrong. Twice the focal length at constant aperture diameter is exactly twice the numerical aperture. That is, when going from 150 to 300mm, the aperture would change from f/5.6 to f/11, and when increasing the focal length by sqrt(2), in our example from 150 to 212mm, the aperture would change by one stop.

    But the assumption of a doubled focal length is wrong as well. IIRC classical Plasmat halves had 1.75 times the focal length of the whole lens, and the slightly asymmetric modern ones often have sth. like a 1.6/1.85 ratio for the halves.

    And you'll have to reckon in that the aperture is now outside the primary plane of the halved lens, so that its projected and physical size aren't identical any more.

    Going by my older Symmars where the spec sheets mention a aperture for "converted" use, I'd expect about 1 1/2 to 1 2/3 stops to fit the bill, but official figures for newer post-"convertible" Plasmat types don't seem to exist.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    5,988

    Re: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    Excellent - Thanks !!!!!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,145

    Re: Removing rear of lens: f/stop unchanged ?

    Ken, if your lens is convertible, check with the manufacturer's specs.

    If it wasn't sold as convertible, here are some examples:

    Boyer Zircon/Saphir BX (plasmat type), complete lens f/5.6, rear cell f/12; complete lens f/7.7, rear cell f/15.4; convertible Symmars' rear cells also have f/#s 2x the complete lens' f/#

    Boyer Saphir (double Gauss type), complete lens f/2.8, rear cell f/5.6

    Boyer Beryl (dagor type), complete lens f/6.8, rear cell f/13

Similar Threads

  1. Chamonix camera 45N-1 focusing error
    By GPS in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 191
    Last Post: 7-Dec-2009, 15:17
  2. Filter size for rear lens element for lens cap purposes
    By Navy Moose in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23-May-2008, 18:53
  3. Removing front lens elements on THC 18" Process Lens
    By Paul Metcalf in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2-Sep-2007, 12:58

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •