For those who are considering the plunge into very expensive digital alternatives to LF, suggest you read Ray Massey's article in Nov issue of Photog Pro where he test drives the Hasselbad 200MS. Among the many comments of interest, he states (paraphrase) that there is not much increase in resolution "on the page" between the straight 50MP vs using the MS feature and stitching images together. He also bemoans the fact that digital camera manufacturers have focused little on the use of movements, and lastly a wish for a larger sensor for use with present LF equipment.
Sounds as if he is a LF lifer and the move to MFDSLRs is not viable, even if affordable.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks