Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    620

    Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    I sent some of my negatives to get drum scanned. I wasn't sure what to expect, but I guess I expected these to be quite noticeably better. Maybe I am just seeings things wrong. Mine are scanned on an Epson 4990 with low sharpening set on the scanner. The drum scans are straight as I received them.

    First one is 8x10 HP5. So the file sizes are similar.

    4990:


    Drum


    For 4x5 I lowered the size for the drum scans as they were scanned larger.
    4990


    Drum


    The drum scans are darker. Perhaps because I didn't set a black point.
    My website Flickr
    "There is little or no ‘reality’ in the blacks, grays and whites of either the informational or expressive black-and-white image" -Ansel Adams

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    620

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    4990


    Drum
    My website Flickr
    "There is little or no ‘reality’ in the blacks, grays and whites of either the informational or expressive black-and-white image" -Ansel Adams

  3. #3
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,971

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    The drum-scanned images look better to me.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    What were you expecting them be like?

    It's impossible to really tell from a couple of jpgs but just looking here, the "darker" ones have increased contrast and the edges of things look sharper.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    620

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt View Post
    The drum-scanned images look better to me.
    They do to me too. But I guess not by as large a margin as I thought they would. It seems I am not gaining much by sending them out. I don't think I'd be able to tell in a print. The 8x10 drum scan looks noticeably softer to me.
    My website Flickr
    "There is little or no ‘reality’ in the blacks, grays and whites of either the informational or expressive black-and-white image" -Ansel Adams

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Southlake TX
    Posts
    1,057

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    There is not a lot of detail in the images to help make a comparison. find an image with plenty of DOF and crisp detail and you will see a didderence.


    Bob

  7. #7
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    You want a real test? Have Lenny Eiger do a drum scan and then compare them. Not all drum scans are as good as they should be.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    620

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Gittings View Post
    You want a real test? Have Lenny Eiger do a drum scan and then compare them. Not all drum scans are as good as they should be.
    That may be the truth.

    4990:


    Drum:


    The drum scan is better. I guess I'm going to have to print these out to see if I can even tell a difference.
    My website Flickr
    "There is little or no ‘reality’ in the blacks, grays and whites of either the informational or expressive black-and-white image" -Ansel Adams

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,679

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    These comparisons are quite illustrative for me. The difference I notice is that the drum scans have more detail in the shadows and in the highlights.

    The flatbed scans are kind of hazy and appear to have more grain. But, that doesn't mean necessarily that they wouldn't necessarily print well.

  10. #10
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: Drum scans vs Epson 4990

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaitz View Post
    That may be the truth.

    4990:


    Drum:


    The drum scan is better. I guess I'm going to have to print these out to see if I can even tell a difference.
    Well the drum scan has considerably more contrast. I don't know how they would compare if you equalized that a bit.

Similar Threads

  1. Howtek vs Imacon vs Epson
    By Michal Makowski in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 25-Oct-2010, 17:55
  2. Windows XP Pro x64 compatibility with Epson 4990 ?
    By Jose Amado in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16-Sep-2007, 10:39
  3. Problems with Epson scanning software, 4990
    By Harley Goldman in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-Sep-2006, 20:53
  4. Epson V700 vs 4990
    By Leonard Evens in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 2-Aug-2006, 17:36
  5. Update - microtek 1800f vs. epson 4990
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 13-Feb-2006, 10:54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •