Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    241

    xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    I did a batch of tri-x yesterday in xtol 1:3 and a good chunk of the negatives with a lot of smooth sky ended up with less density on the sky edge in the negative. I processed at about 70 degrees for 12 minutes. Aside from the strange edges the negs look pretty good. I've never had that trouble using hc110 for 9 minutes in the jobo 3010. Could that added development time had something to with it? Thanks.

  2. #2
    Resident Heretic Bruce Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,362

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    What volume of chemistry? How fast was the drum turned? Reversing or not? What was turning the drum -- a Jobo processor? Hand rolling on a table?

    Without more to go on, all I can tell you is that I've done hundreds of sheets of both Tri-X and TMY-2 in a 3010 tank in XTOL 1:3 and each and every one turned out just about perfect. It's normal to get excellent, even development corner to corner with a 3010 drum.

    So give us more details; maybe we can figure out what's wrong in your case.

    Bruce Watson

  3. #3
    Jon Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    651

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Watson View Post
    What volume of chemistry? How fast was the drum turned? Reversing or not? What was turning the drum -- a Jobo processor? Hand rolling on a table?

    Without more to go on, all I can tell you is that I've done hundreds of sheets of both Tri-X and TMY-2 in a 3010 tank in XTOL 1:3 and each and every one turned out just about perfect. It's normal to get excellent, even development corner to corner with a 3010 drum.

    So give us more details; maybe we can figure out what's wrong in your case.
    Bruce, what ISO do you rate the TMY-2 and Tri-X. A friend was recently developing some Tri-X which was shot with a rating of ISO 100 and developed at 1:1 for 2:00. Although he used 35mm, I am trying to translate that information to my LF sheets.

    Thanks. Jon

  4. #4
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    Using replenished XTOL will provide better tonality, ... . And properly done, the XTOL goes on "forever". I have been using it for over two years.

    In a Jobo, do not pre-wet, develop the [full time + one minute] adjusted for the temperature and you will not ove the edge density problems.
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,074

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    Using replenished XTOL will provide better tonality, ... . And properly done, the XTOL goes on "forever". I have been using it for over two years.

    In a Jobo, do not pre-wet, develop the [full time + one minute] adjusted for the temperature and you will not ove the edge density problems.
    Sirius,

    At what point in time does XTOL become aged sufficiently to become functionally "replenished XTOL", worthy of its name?

    Asher

  6. #6
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    Quote Originally Posted by Asher Kelman View Post
    Sirius,

    At what point in time does XTOL become aged sufficiently to become functionally "replenished XTOL", worthy of its name?

    Asher
    After each batch I replenish. That means up to four rolls of 135-16, or up to four rolls of 120, or up to ten 4x5s. I have never done any measurements of the changes between fresh and various stages of replenished developer. I do not have a density meter. I just use the stuff and I do not get into the endless testing and measuring cycles that some people drive themselves nuts with.

    If I used fresh developer on one batch and replenished months later, I do not worry about the first batch ==> why? because there is nothing I can change in the negative from the first batch ... I just print it for the best result that can be achieved.

    Since I have used a batch of replenished XTOL for over two years, I do not worry about it. When do I start over? When I do something stupid like spill too much of it or pour something into the bottle that I should not have.
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    2,428

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    My experience is that pre-wetting made my negs much more uniform in the 3010 when using Xtol. I also use it one shot. Costs a little more, but is simpler. With TMY-2 Kodak quit recommending 1:3, so I switched to 1:1 or 1:2, and it seems to work about the same. Same volume of developer, just less distilled water.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Stevens Point, WI
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    I always pre-wet with a jobo.

    You might check that the Jobo, and the tank as it sits in the water bath, are level. Out of level could cause some problems.

  9. #9
    Cordless Bungee Jumper Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,123

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    The Jobo manual specifically states that when using XTOL, the film should NOT be prewet. Go argue with them.

    Steve
    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    2,428

    Re: xtol 1:3 jobo 3010 less density on edges

    >The Jobo manual specifically states that when using XTOL, the film should NOT be prewet.

    I followed their recommendations for the first couple of hundred of sheets. I noticed a consistent problem with skies. I started pre-wetting, and did not have the problem afterwards. YMMV

Similar Threads

  1. JOBO 3010 Advice
    By gbr1000 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 13-Sep-2010, 19:25
  2. Difference between Jobo 3010 vs. 2551
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 13-Nov-2006, 17:20
  3. Please Explain: Density Ranges
    By Richard Ryerson in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-May-2005, 07:43
  4. Time of HP-5 in Xtol with Jobo Processing
    By William Marderness in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Jan-2000, 15:35

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •