Slosher is back $65

[Brian Ellis]

If I switch to the Slosher will my prints look just like John's?

[dap]

Do you make them for 5x7?

That would be nice - I'll second the request.

[tgtaylor]

I thought John Sexton used a Jobo.

Thomas

[Gudmundur Ingolfsson]

Weegee the great was promoting some product once (I think is was flashbulbs) and his saying would go for Sexton and JOBO ; I endorse this product but I don't necessarily use it.

[Michael Clark]

If I switch to the Slosher will my prints look just like John's?

Take his work shop and may be they will. Sexton has a Jobo in his darkroom but also has trays, don't think he is tied down to any particular method of film development but did say he was happy with the results.

[sepstein17]

Here's the 3rd request for a 5x7 slosher.

[C. D. Keth]

You might consider updating the web page, as it lists the price at $45.

It also says, "If you’re a medium or large format photographer you probably already have a Polaroid® film back to evaluate lighting ratios, exposure, filter effects and composition."

[David Karp]

I believe Mr. Sexton uses the slosher for compensating development with minimal agitation in dilute developer.

[amzee95]

I have been using a Sexton designed Slosher since the early 90's and I think it is a great tool for processing 4x5 sheet film. I used it yesterday to process 24 sheets and it does its job extremely well for me.

whoo great news mine is intrested to buy it

[Dan Henderson]

I was a proponent of Yankee tanks until I started noticing uneven development in sky areas while working on a project. Tried every agitation variation suggested here and on other forums. Even tried holding my tongue a certain way while developing. Finally gave in and bought one of the (I think) older versions of this slosher from the Formulary. Worked out a random, gentle agitation scheme and have perfectly even skies.