Frank, got to say, I like that picture-
Is it behind glass?
Has it had any modern processing?
That looks like a pretty serious brace too-
I still use one of those pos Manfrottos myself, though it doesn't travel far-
Actually, apart from the weight, it's not so bad, and it does go up tall...
And yes, great picture David, i noticed in your profile ages ago-
[IMG]http:/www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=409691893878&set=a.382949823878.162277.608678878&type=1&theater[/IMG]
I like the middle one Sean. It makes you look like a mean mother.
Mike
No the guy was a student and didn't fix or spot it properly, but it is degrading quite nicely, it looks a bit like one of those fancy alternative processes that people here spend thousands of dollars and hours trying to replicate. But instead of being high art it is just sloppy conventional processing of a muddy print....
lol yep cell phone photo through glass, it is fading in my workshop....
Yes I had knee surgery in 1982 and quite the recovery... nowadays the same injury would be done in a day with a minor 5mm scar.... I have twin 8" scars as a result.
This is me circa 1970. I think it was a Kodak 2D. It only cost me £100 complete with a Kodak 12" lens in a shutter. Complete with 1 DDS. and everything worked. I kept it for a couple of years and then sold it for £100. So I was happy.
Photographs by Richard M. Coda
my blog
Primordial: 2010 - Photographs of the Arizona Monsoon
"Speak softly and carry an 8x10"
"I shoot a HYBRID - Arca/Canham 11x14"
I bought my Kodak 2D with a TR triple convertible 12" 21" 28" with 8 8x10 holders for $50. Sold just the camera last year for $250. Kept everything else. With inflation, probably broke even.... Oh, that's right I have the lens, but the holders don't work.
Mark Woods
Large Format B&W
Cinematography Mentor at the American Film Institute
Past President of the Pasadena Society of Artists
Director of Photography
Pasadena, CA
www.markwoods.com
Bookmarks