Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

  1. #1

    Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    Hi all.
    First post here.

    I am looking at purchasing, oh, from what I've gathered I'm looking at getting either one of the (oldish) used Microtek Artixscan scanners, 1800 or 2500 series probably.

    When I've looked at reviews etc of these scanners, most of the info is from 2001 or so. Can anyone tell me if there has been any updated info about the better scanners to get for slides and/or art-type scans?

    Just wondering if there have been any advances made in competitors to these affordable quality scanners? Or, is there any preference to particular models in these Microtek ranges? I think some I've seen are 1800f, 2500f, etc?

    Thanks for any help...

    Dan

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    173

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    I like the ArtixScan M1 that I have - I feel it was a step up from the Epson 4870 that I was using before. Having the separate scan drawer instead of using the glass bed seems a lot easier, and I have less dust to deal with after a scan.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    1,653

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    I thought Microtek stopped selling in the US some time ago.

    Get an Epson, Smith.
    When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

    http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Photography/index.html

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    Microtek M1 was the latest-last one I think, the Epson 4990 was the competitor. You can find used or refurbished Epson 4990s for $200 or so. The M1 was more expensive but less reliable, I think performance was a wash.

  5. #5
    Preston Birdwell
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Columbia, CA
    Posts
    1,587

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    I like my 1800f for 4x5 and for documents, but for 35mm and medium format, it's not really up to the task to create high quality scans for larger prints.

    --P
    Preston-Columbia CA

    "If you want nice fresh oats, you have to pay a fair price. If you can be satisfied with oats that have already been through the horse; that comes a little cheaper."

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
    Posts
    117

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    I have an ArtixScan M1. I like the results with it but it is SLOW! And it grunts and groans a lot when scanning, too.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mt. Victoria,The Land Down Under
    Posts
    117

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    Buy one. I have the F1 - its great.
    Be a slave to technology, or shoot film.
    www.abriefvisionoftime.com
    www.photorepair.com.au

  8. #8
    Arca-Swiss
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    294

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    Watch out for these older ones though. Drivers for the newer OS are hard to find.
    V750 m Pro is an excellent one though above the others in price. V700 not bad.
    Rod Klukas
    US Representative
    Arca-Swiss USA
    480-755-3364
    www.arca-swiss-usa.com

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Carmel Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,048

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    The Epsons have Digital ICE-- don't believe that the Microteks have it (actual IR channel implementation, not just some software solution)?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Germany, Aalen
    Posts
    849

    Re: Looking at Microtek scanners, any advice?

    I have the Microtek F1 (european version of the M1, but is includes some kind of ICE). I have mexed feeling with this scanner. It can do a VERY good job if it gets the focus right. It is laud and slow but with 4x5 I find the speed OK. The Dmax is rather good. I have troubles with color calibration (yes, still - not enough time), but I would assign that to operator problem (intel inside, idiot outside .. ).

    he holders are quite good. I do not use the ICE - I use pressurized (canned) gas and get I am left with very little dust afterwards.

    The scanner has a tendency to get faint strips on the scan in the direction in which the head moves - probably a tiny spec of dust somewhere. The first time I sent it back to microtek, but now I have to deal with it myself somehow.

    And it is noisy. We have 2 room apartment and my wife is getting crazy if I scan for a longer time.

    One of the weak points for me is the software - I use the Silverfast Studio 'something', but it really aches. Slow response, bad layout, stability.

    So - it can deliver decent results, but it requires patience.
    Matus

Similar Threads

  1. Eversmart vs drum scanners & Aztek plateau
    By 8x10 user in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 22-Mar-2023, 20:14
  2. Newb advice on scanners
    By algarzai in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 4-Jun-2010, 03:00
  3. New Scanners from Microtek
    By Scott Rosenberg in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26-Jul-2005, 14:43
  4. Microtek 900 or Epson 4990 or Microtek 1800
    By Ron Marshall in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 3-Apr-2005, 11:37
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-Sep-2004, 08:59

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •