Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 4x5 field stability of digital capture?

  1. #1

    4x5 field stability of digital capture?

    Is there a field camera being manufactured now which has a clear advantage in st ability, sufficient to be usable with a digital back? Given the long exposure t imes, I assume that everything must be optimizedm, i.e., heavy tripod, rigid bal lhead/QR coupling, umbrella to windward... However, all the work I've seen has been done apparently on Sinar or other rail cameras. Are the backs just too hea vy for field designs? Are some field cameras sturdy enough for the task?

  2. #2
    Lost mike rosenlof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Location
    Louisville, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    305

    4x5 field stability of digital capture?

    I have no idea about the backs' weight, but I've looked at a few field cameras lately. The Toyo 45A was the most rigid, the Canham wood was second. The Canham DLC and Wista followed in that order. These are all I've looked at recently.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Posts
    1,973

    4x5 field stability of digital capture?

    I could be very wrong on this but i believe Stephen Johnson is using a Sinar P o r P2 camera with his digital rig. if you like to make 2 minute plus exposures fo r landscapes, i guess digital in the field will work for you. Having said that I am impressed with the contrast range of his imagery. there is probably more in fo at his site: http://www.best.com/~sjphoto/

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Posts
    1,973

    4x5 field stability of digital capture?

    Too further answer your question I think Johnson uses a Sinar P series camera be cause of the mass, not just the rigidity or sturdiness. The ccd capture area for most digital capture cameras is much smaller than 4x5 so this means you have to use shorter lenses as equivalent focal lengths for standard lens choices. So yo u will need to keep this limitation in mind as well.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Posts
    1,973

    4x5 field stability of digital capture?

    More explnation: Stephen told me this morning that he uses a Sinar X camera, als o that he is looking at a field camera because the Sinar is getting too heavy th e farther afield he goes.

    Michael at BetterLight, who makes the digital system Stephen Johson uses, says that he knows of one photographer up in Washington state who is using the Canham DLC and that he also thinks the Linhof Master Technika would be a good choice. Michaels confirms the choice of the Sinar X camera for mass.

    So perhaps a good alternative would be the Arca Swiss F-Line?

  6. #6

    4x5 field stability of digital capture?

    Ron Wisner responded to a similar posting on CompuServe by referring me to Nicholas Hellmuth's work, shooting Mayan archeology with Wisner 4x5 and digital back. Fairly demanding conditions. Some of the images thus created depicted at www.digital-photography.org, also very extensive review of lots of equipment. Must be that's how he repays manufacturers who donate stuff to him. Having said that, the reviews seem to ring true when he writes of equipment which I know.

Similar Threads

  1. Print size chart when using digital capture
    By Eric Leppanen in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-Apr-2006, 16:10
  2. Using scanner to capture 8"x10" positive
    By Johnny Eng in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 31-Mar-2006, 15:53
  3. Architecture: LF film vs. 35mm digital capture
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2005, 10:32
  4. Digital Capture & Standard LF Lenses
    By neil poulsen in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2005, 14:47
  5. Digital field or View camera
    By Dick Roadnight in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-Feb-2004, 11:54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •