Nude

[ustas]

[IMG][/IMG]

"In the Light"
13x18 Ilford delta 100
Dallmeyer 3D

[ustas]

[IMG][/IMG]

"deep inside"
13x18 Svema 64
Pulligny landscape lens f16

[Ash]

Ustas I love your photos, but this one seems very weak. Did you rush to scan this? You've lost a lot of the tones and the contrast seems wrong. Usually your pictures have a wonderful gradient between light and dark.

[ustas]

Ok)
This is another try

[IMG][/IMG]

[George Kara]

"In the Light"
13x18 Ilford delta 100
Dallmeyer 3D

Lovely image and use of light. Very painterly.

[George Kara]

Darlot 270mm Petzval lens on 8x10 camera, HP5+ processed with PMK pyro

I was so taken with this image that I took the liberty of using it in an oil painting just completed. I know its not LF nonetheless derivative of this most powerful of images. I have named it "Superhero with nevus and accompanying nevi." The title is from the description of another poster who is obviously a retired Doc.

[mdm]

I was so taken with this image that I took the liberty of using it in an oil painting just completed. I know its not LF nonetheless derivative of this most powerful of images. I have named it "Superhero with nevus and accompanying nevi." The title is from the description of another poster who is obviously a retired Doc.

Clearly you are more of a plagiarist than an artist. One wonders if all of your paintings are stolen images and ideas with so little independant creative input.

[Frank Petronio]

Oh for Christchurch's sake....

[CarstenW]

Yup, that was just totally unnecessarily harsh, and potentially way off the mark. Hard to believe that people post stuff like that without knowing the recipient.

[Peter Mounier]

I was thinking the same thing as David, although didn't say anything because that's an issue that's rightfully between the painter and the photographer. It's a legitimate concern, and Frank's comment seems to be "Who cares? Don't be so petty."
Am I reading you correctly Frank? You don't respect intellectual property?

Peter