Great work on light and improvising![]()
If you dont mind me asking - painted with light, as in - with actual movements of light brush/torch?
How do you calculate it? I never got hang on that technique mainly b/c i have issues with getting predictable results. I cant visualize quite complex lighting with strobes (even when not using any modeling light) but for whatever reason getting repeateable results with light brush eludes me completely, even on digital. Less so on film.
Nope. I said that I had only skimmed the thread and that "of the photographs I've seen" all but one were female etc. There's a difference between saying that all the subjects in the thread were female and attractive and saying that "of the photographs I've seen" all were female and attractive. The first statement relates to the entire thread. The second relates only to the photographs in the thread that I've seen. I would have thought the difference was fairly obvious, especially when I prefaced the latter statement by saying I had only skimmed the thread (i.e. I made no claim to have seen all the photographs in the thread).
Brian Ellis
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
a mile away and you'll have their shoes.
If your observations were based on only a cursory examination...
Why did you suggest changing the title?
Wouldn't such drastic action require a more thorough investigation?
- Leigh
“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.” - Plato
Nope again. As you pointed out in a previous message (short memory?), I don't control the title of the thread and I have no power to change it. I simply made a suggestion for the consideration of others. A suggestion by someone who has no power to act on the suggestion isn't usually considered to be a "drastic action."
Brian Ellis
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
a mile away and you'll have their shoes.
Bookmarks