Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Sironar-N"MC" question

  1. #11

    Sironar-N"MC" question

    Whatever the reason, it's too bad the APO Sironar-W series is no longer made. A s wonderful as the APO Sironar-S series is (my 150mm APO Sironar-S is one of my all-time favorite 4x5 lenses), sometimes you REALLY need that extra 5 degrees of coverage. On 5x7, you get twice as much rise and shift with the 150mm APO Siro nar-W vs. the 150mm APO Sironar-S. Likewise on 8x10, the 210mm APO Sironar-N gi ves you almost no movements (3mm rise, 2mm shift) while the 210mm APO Sironar-W gives you about an inch in either direction (29mm rise, 24mm shift). Probably n ot enough for architecture, but sufficient for many landscape situations.

    The only other modern, multicoated 80 degree semi-wide lenses were the Super Sym mar HM series. They were also fantastic lenses that have been discontinued afte r the introduction of the Super Symmar XL series. One advantage the APO Sironar -W series had was they were considerably lighter than the Super Symmar HM lenses in comparable focal lengths. The 150mm APO Sironar-W is about 1/2 the weight o f the 150mm Super Symmar HM (380g vs. 740g). In the 210 focal lengths, the APO Sironar-W is also significantly lighter than the Super Symmar HM (950g vs. 1510g ). While weight may not be a signifcant factor for all users, as a field photog rapher who hikes and backpacks, I'm really fond of lenses that combine great per formance, good coverage, and reasonable size and weight. It's too bad Rodenstoc k never offered an APO Sironar-W in a shorter focal length - say something in th e 110 - 120mm range. Although the coverage would not be as generous as the 110m m Super Symmar XL, it would have been adaquate for 4x5 field use, and considerab ly smaller, lighter and cheaper than the 110 SS XL (mind you, I think the 110 SS XL is a GREAT lens, but I'd be willing to sacrifice a little coverage for a sma ller, lighter, less expensive lens of comparable quality).

    Well, enough dreaming. I am fortunate to own lenses from all the Rodenstock ser ies (APO Sironar-N, -S and -W). They each have a special place in my kit and I appreciate them each for their own unique qualities.

    Kerry

  2. #12

    Sironar-N"MC" question

    Oops, typo in my previous post. Should have been:

    Likewise on 8x10, the 210mm APO Sironar-S gives you almost no m ovements (3mm rise, 2mm shift)...

  3. #13

    Sironar-N"MC" question

    thanks for all the feedback, folks. Very informative.

    Larry
    Larry Mendenhall
    www.quiet-places.com

Similar Threads

  1. 300mm Rodenstock Sironar-S vs. Sironar-N
    By Ralph in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 8-Sep-2009, 11:24
  2. 300mm APO Sironar-N versus 300mm Sironar-S
    By J. P. Mose in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 23-Mar-2005, 10:00
  3. 150mm Sironar vs Sironar-N vs G-Claron
    By Edward (Halifax,NS) in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 4-May-2004, 10:36
  4. sironar
    By peter koning in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14-Nov-2001, 08:32
  5. Sironar-S or -N for 210/5.6
    By john costo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-Aug-1998, 00:15

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •