Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

  1. #1
    Vlad Soare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    466

    Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Hi guys,

    If D is the distance between the lens and the subject (focused), F is the focal length of the lens, and E is the distance between the lens and the ground glass, is there a mathematical formula that calculates D as a function of F and E?

    Thank you.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Ind.
    Posts
    590

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    The lens equation:

    1/F = 1/D + 1/E

    Works for "thin lenses". For real lenses D is measured from subject to Front Nodal Point and E is measured from ground glass to Rear Nodal Point. The difficulty comes in knowing the locations of these Nodal Points. For telephoto and retrofocus lenses they can be quite far away from the center of the lens.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Glendale, AZ
    Posts
    102

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    I was taught a simple way to calculate exposure compensation for bellows extension.

    Convert the focal length of the lens to inches and think of that as an aperture setting... For example, a 210mm lens id about f/8 1/3. So then look at the distance between the standards in inches as another aperture setting. The difference in stops is the compensation.

    If you have a 210mm lens and have the bellows extended to 16 inches you should adjust the exposure by 1 2/3 stops.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    near Seattle, WA
    Posts
    956

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Vlad,

    Using your nomenclature, then according to my Leica Manual:

    D = (E x F) / (E - F), where D and E are measured to the lens diaphragm

  5. #5
    Vlad Soare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    466

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Thanks, guys.
    I understand that it's difficult to know where the nodal point is, but I don't need extreme precision. A rough approximation will do.

    I'm trying to figure out what the longest lens usable on my camera is, and under what circumstances (at what distance from the subject, that is). The camera is a Chamonix 045n-1. The maximum extension of the camera is 395mm.
    Let's say I wanted to use a 360mm lens. With the bellows extended out to 395mm, the lens would be focused at 360*395/(395-360) = 4063mm.
    So, can I assume that a 360mm lens can be used on my camera with subjects from about 4 meters to infinity?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,484

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Vlad, I just checked y'r arithmetic. You're right.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Ind.
    Posts
    590

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Yes, but with a 360/5.5 Tele-Xenar with back focal length of 184mm you could focus to just about 1 meter.

    Take maximum image distance = focal length + max extension - back focal length.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    near Seattle, WA
    Posts
    956

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    I've not done much close-up work, but it seems to me that a WA lens (e.g., 90mm Super Angulon) would not require very much bellows draw. Any drawbacks to this?

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Posts
    1,884

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Here's another one from Deardorff's (Kellsey) Corrective Photography.
    if r=(times of reduction;i.e. linear object size divided by linear image size)
    D=(r+1) x F
    e=D/r
    F=D/r+1
    Regards
    Bill

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,484

    Re: Bellows Extension/Focusing Distance Formula

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Bodine View Post
    I've not done much close-up work, but it seems to me that a WA lens (e.g., 90mm Super Angulon) would not require very much bellows draw. Any drawbacks to this?
    Short working distance. Possibly, great stress possibly, so-so image quality.

Similar Threads

  1. Making a Sinar 8x10 bellows from another manufacturer's bellows?
    By Frank Petronio in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2010, 12:55
  2. Zone VI bellows material and reconditioning?
    By Randall Cherry in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2007, 14:37
  3. Arca Swiss Bellows Alternatives
    By tedkaufman in forum Gear
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18-May-2002, 20:16
  4. Diffraction and Lens Flare
    By Paul Mongillo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-Mar-2000, 13:57
  5. Formula for bellows factor
    By Bryan Fleishman in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8-Jan-1999, 15:12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •