Lenny & Drew - you are probably less than an hour from each other. Meet up. Lenny show him what you got and give us a report.
PS if there is any screaming, yelling and hair pulling please remember the video and post on Youtube. Thank you.
Lenny & Drew - you are probably less than an hour from each other. Meet up. Lenny show him what you got and give us a report.
PS if there is any screaming, yelling and hair pulling please remember the video and post on Youtube. Thank you.
another good source of excellent prints is Richard Lohmann ( http://www.richardlohmann.com/ ). He also mixes his own inks (works on them with Tom Mallonee http://www.tommallonee.com/ ). Richard is a long time silver and platinum printer (prints for platinum prints for the Imogen Cunningham Trust). He also lives in the Bay area
Richard started in the mid 90's making digital negs for platinum printing and then moved to full digital. He has some nice work.
I saw some of Tom's work about 7-8 years ago and was really blown away.
They were the first digital prints I saw that made me think "maybe..."
At one time Richard was using Efke 25 in Dr.5 and scanning. Is this still his method or is he using digital capture?
do you want to be a photographer or a digital inkjetter.
simple really
i personally use a darkroom and keep my inkjet for shouting practice
Umm ... you do realize that is basically a non-sequitur, right? A photography takes pictures. A printer (man and/or machine) prints pictures. Many a photographer doesn't print, and a good number of printers I've known don't photography beyond their kids birthday, but I don't see how they are necessarily exclusive of each other.
hence why i said DIGITAL inkjetter, ie digital camera/scanner file.
aimed at original poster
photographer or digital inkjeter
simple they are quite different you know, hard to compare
Ret, I don't understand your logic.
My present desire is to become a photographer who has mastered the skill required to produce a fine print with an inkjet printer.
I had the same desire when I was attempting to master the skill required to make a fine print with an optical enlarger in a darkroom.
i thought i was supposed to be responding to the original poster on this thread.
he is not sure on his direction
one route is a photographic route (darkroom)
another route is a inkjet (non photographic)
so putting it simply inkjetter or photography
theirs your choices
ive never liked the idea of calling myself a inkjetter
Bookmarks