Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: Film exposed in hand inspection

  1. #61
    ARS KC2UU
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Morristown, NJ USA
    Posts
    741

    Re: Film exposed in hand inspection

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Meisburger View Post
    I used to carry a dark bag and try to get hand inspection, but it just confused everyone. I now normally put my exposed and unexposed film in a lead-lined bag and put it in my carry-on (never put any film in checked baggage! I ruined a whole trip's worth with that mistake). I have always expected that the lead bag would raise eyebrows passing through the scanner, but only once out of about twenty times have I been asked to take out the bag. In that case I let them scan the film boxes. I have used the bag in US, European and Asian airports with no problem. Not sure if they still sell them, but I bought two at a local thrift shop last time I was in the US.
    My experience has been different. I've travelled perhaps fifty times with a backpack of MF/LF cameras and film. I have been asked to open my backpack every time except one.

    So what I always do is put less sensitive films in a separate gray plastic tub with keys combs, cell phones, and other easily identified devices/items. That way the technician does not spend a lot of time with the stuff under the beam x-raying the film to death.

    And I ask for hand inspection on certain unopened roll films that I perceive to be more x-ray sensitive.

    So far no problems. Bob G.
    All natural images are analog. But the retina converts them to digital on their way to the brain.

  2. #62
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,614

    Re: Film exposed in hand inspection

    Quote Originally Posted by rguinter View Post
    My experience has been different. I've travelled perhaps fifty times with a backpack of MF/LF cameras and film. I have been asked to open my backpack every time except one.

    So what I always do is put less sensitive films in a separate gray plastic tub with keys combs, cell phones, and other easily identified devices/items. That way the technician does not spend a lot of time with the stuff under the beam x-raying the film to death.

    And I ask for hand inspection on certain unopened roll films that I perceive to be more x-ray sensitive.

    So far no problems. Bob G.
    First off, I don't think the X-ray is on when the technician halts the belt to review images more carefully. There is a red light on the top of the machine that shows when the X-ray is on, as a safety device probably required by OSHA.

    Nor do I think they increase the intensity to punch through opaque objects. They do reportedly do that with checked bags, but those are in more fully enclosed machines that are safer for the operators. If they can't see something sufficiently in the regular security line, they inspect it by hand.

    I traveled just last week with a backpack full of Pentax 6x7 stuff, and was not required to open the pack either at Dulles, Portland, or Spokane. That surprised me, actually, especially at the smaller airports, which are usually more picky. I got no indication that the pack received any special consideration. I was carrying only Velvia 50 and I didn't worry about exposure.

    Rick "adding some data points" Denney

  3. #63

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles de Porciúncula
    Posts
    5,812

    Re: Film exposed in hand inspection

    Quote Originally Posted by rdenney View Post
    surprised me, actually, especially at the smaller airports, which are usually more picky. I got no indication that the pack received any special consideration.

    A couple of years ago my bag, with Hasselblad, got LOTS of special consideration at a small airport -- Redding, CA. The TSA guy looked at the xray machine screen, called over his friend, pointed and whispered, then pulled my bag aside for "special inspection". The guys asked if I had a Mamiya in the bag. When I said it was a Hasselblad they asked if they could visually inspect it since they have never handled a Hasselblad. I actually had a fairly good time giving them a chance to handle the camera. They admitted that their inspection was from a photographic curiousity perspective, not from an airline security perspective. Generally, though, I've found TSA to be quite disinterested in the cameras I send under their Xray machine.

  4. #64

    Re: Film exposed in hand inspection

    This is what the damage looks like. It's pretty much the same for one box of 34 sheets; the other box is less severe because it was packed more tightly.

Similar Threads

  1. That elusive term: "Perspective"
    By Heroique in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 25-Jun-2009, 02:48
  2. I'm a film testing moron- wadda ya think?
    By timbo10ca in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 22-May-2007, 17:50
  3. Film vs. Digital
    By Richard Boulware in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 103
    Last Post: 13-Feb-2006, 07:44
  4. How to Store Exposed Film Before Processing?
    By Chad Cook in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-Oct-2003, 16:17
  5. silliest question ever: how to load sheet film
    By David Haardt in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 7-Jun-2001, 17:55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •