Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,639

    What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    I currently have an Epson v700 scanner with the original holders.
    I understand you can wet mount, I understand there are the betterscanning holders.

    If I got rid of the Epson V700, which is the next best scanner? As in, what will do a better job, work with a Mac, run on USB, and doesn't cost a few grand?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,639

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    Anyone, anything?

  3. #3

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    Thats the top of the consumer line, better results you just get from pro-scanners, but they are much more expensive; alternative you can look for an old drumscanner.
    Regards
    Martin

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    Sex
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    2,428

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    What about the 750 - it has better coated optics, I think it is focusable, and using Vuescan (maybe others as well) you can scan at 6400 with the high rez lens and automatically down sample to 2400, given better resolution because of the optics and the noise averaging.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    What's better than 4x5 on an Epson V700/750 ? 5x7 on the same Epson V700/750

    You get to keep your affordable scanner, but reap a 36% increase in performance *.

    You can spend that 36% any way you like: You can make prints that are 36% larger, or you can use lenses that are 36% worse. Or you can shoot film that is 36% grainier. Or you can make prints that are 36% "better".

    *
    If we consider 4x5 film as 3.75 x 4.75, the diagonal is 154mm.
    If we consider 5x7 film as 4.75 x 6.75, the diagonal is 210mm.
    Since 210 is 136% of 154, the increase is 36%.
    Last edited by Ken Lee; 3-May-2010 at 15:43.

  7. #7
    ARS KC2UU
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Morristown, NJ USA
    Posts
    741

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Lee View Post
    What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    What's better than 4x5 on an Epson V700/750 ? 5x7 on the same Epson V700/750 ... [/I]
    Ken: Not trying to be sarcastic but... if a wide variety of film were available in 5x7 that would be an ideal solution. But there isn't...

    Bob G.
    All natural images are analog. But the retina converts them to digital on their way to the brain.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    if a wide variety of film were available in 5x7 that would be an ideal solution. But there isn't...

    It's true that fewer films are available in 5x7, but b&w shooters probably experience less scarcity than the rest.

    On the other hand, my own experience is that with Pyrocat HD developer, one can shoot Ilford FP4+ and HP5+ at their stated film speeds. At 5x7 size, these films match or out-perform their 4x5 Kodak counterparts, except perhaps with regards to reciprocity. But for those who rarely make long exposures, reciprocity is not a major concern.

    Fortunately, Ilford and others support us with a wide variety of film sizes - but if I had to, I would probably purchase larger film, and cut it down to 5x7. This is another situation where Infra Red viewing devices pay for themselves the first day out of the box.

    On a related note, Microtek has informed us that they now offer their line of scanners in the US.

    See this recent announcement.
    Last edited by Ken Lee; 8-May-2010 at 14:01.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,639

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    ok... so the answer is Epson have cornered the market, there's no alternative?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    181

    Re: What's better than a Epson V700/750?

    Epson didn't corner the market, everybody else left the market. (At least in the consumer area.)

Similar Threads

  1. Printer recommendation for nice colour, B&W, and alt-processes
    By walter23 in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2009, 08:54
  2. Epson 3800 'Noises' / 'Problems'
    By Julian Boulter in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19-Oct-2008, 22:34
  3. Epson court decision
    By Tyler Boley in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 5-Jan-2008, 09:20
  4. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 17-Oct-2007, 19:16
  5. New Epson scanners : V-750M Pro & V-700 Photo
    By Ellis Vener in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 2-Mar-2006, 09:26

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •