Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47

Thread: historic photograph: real or fake?

  1. #21
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,377

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    the b/b circus does something like this these days
    except instead of pedal bikes they have motorcycles ...

  2. #22

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Montara, California
    Posts
    1,827

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    Quote Originally Posted by jnanian View Post
    the b/b circus does something like this these days
    except instead of pedal bikes they have motorcycles ...
    Well, if you are going to add motorcycles yo need to also add a cantaloupe-sized metal, chromed ball.

    --Darin

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    743

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    Having ridden on a concrete velodrome that had 41 degree banks, I do not believe the riders could be riding slowly or near stationary on a small, wooden track with gaps between the slats. You need some speed to keep up on a track with high banks, otherwise your tires will slip down the surface of the track. The slower you go, the more upright you will be, and they guys are just not going very fast.

    I like the suggestion someone made that the bikes are suppored. Perhaps there are pegs under the tires to hold them up on the banks.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,248

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    We may never know how the shot was made, but, bike racers are tough, I think this sport should be part of the X Games . Sponsored by RedBull or Monster, & perhaps BlueCross Medical.
    Real cameras are measured in inches...
    Not pixels.

    www.photocollective.org

  5. #25
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,614

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Keyes View Post
    Having ridden on a concrete velodrome that had 41 degree banks, I do not believe the riders could be riding slowly or near stationary on a small, wooden track with gaps between the slats. You need some speed to keep up on a track with high banks, otherwise your tires will slip down the surface of the track. The slower you go, the more upright you will be, and they guys are just not going very fast.
    I agree. The maximum lean possible on a bicycle is about 45 degrees. The contact patch is not large, and the gaps between the slats on this "track" would create holes in that contact patch. The only way I can think of where riding such a track would be possible is to enter the track with some speed, even if from a standing start, so that the cyclists would be leaning into the track. The vector that describes the force of the cyclist into the track has to shift back and forth over the contact patch, else the cyclist falls.

    My suspicion is that photographing stunt cyclists on such a track would be difficult, even with carbon-arc lamps, so they probably staged this photo for publicity purposes.

    I do not, however, doubt that it is possible to ride such a track, even with four riders. These bikes have direct gearing, like all track bikes, and maintaining speed well enough for them to coordinate their actions is not that difficult. Those of us who have ridden track bikes on a velodrome will confirm that--one common practice in the early 20th century was for cyclists to follow motorcyclists on such tracks, with the cyclist having to maintain the tiny distance necessary to stay in the derny's draft without actually piling into it (though they did have rollers for casual touching).

    Rick "whose track bike is collecting dust in the basement, as usual" Denney

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    4,431

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    Statues or a "still life" shot during the stated period. I read a snippet of this description somewhere but can't find it now.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    743

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    Quote Originally Posted by dsphotog View Post
    We may never know how the shot was made, but, bike racers are tough, I think this sport should be part of the X Games . Sponsored by RedBull or Monster, & perhaps BlueCross Medical.
    Bicycle track racing is already part of the Summer Olympics. The real Olympics, not any X-Games or such thing...

    It's actually pretty intertaining as the races are relatively short in length, run at high speeds, and very competetive.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    644

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    11 thinks he's doing something people actually care about
    8 knows he got bamboozled into it but now can only hope he doesn't injured by 5
    5 is wondering how the other 3 got up on the track
    2 is the eventual winner

  9. #29
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    Quote Originally Posted by dsphotog View Post
    Board track racing was a popular spectator sport, so the theater setting was real.
    I think it was a promo pic, with riders stationary on the track.
    That had to be real scary to race on.
    Only two of the bicyclist are actually on "racing cycles" (the ones with the drop bars-you can't generate any power in an upright position with the upright bars and too much wind resistance too). The other two are on cruisers. This is definitely not an actual race.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Re: historic photograph: real or fake?

    In one of her writings Susan Sontag talked about the veil of obscurity that eventually renders all photographs, even the most mundane, works of art. I suspect that the explanation for the making of this photograph is simple, but not knowing how it happened introduces an ambiguity that heightens our interest, as evidenced by the numerous comments in this thread.


    Sandy King
    For discussion and information about carbon transfer please visit the carbon group at groups.io
    [url]https://groups.io/g/carbon

Similar Threads

  1. Are photograph titles important?
    By Nate Battles in forum On Photography
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 15-Dec-2012, 22:44
  2. Criticizing a photograph
    By 400d in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 26-Aug-2007, 05:37
  3. Photo ops in Historic Philadelphia
    By Jim Thompson in forum Location & Travel
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-Aug-2007, 16:35
  4. Pain vs. Pleasure - Making a Great Photograph
    By Ed K. in forum On Photography
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 19-Jun-2006, 17:32
  5. Photograph Exchange
    By Dan Morgan in forum Announcements
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 5-Jun-2004, 12:58

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •