Thanks for posting it. He seems like a lovely guy and I really like his (seemingly casual) approach. I'd love to have a go myself one day.
Thanks for posting it. He seems like a lovely guy and I really like his (seemingly casual) approach. I'd love to have a go myself one day.
Sanchi,
Don't forget to factor in the cost of every failed print before you get a keeper, if an 8X10 costs about $10, but it takes 5 or 6 trials before you dial in the process to get the keeper, then your cost just became $60 for that 8X10.
I keep my costs down by having low standards for an acceptable pt/pd print. I also do use a densitometer, which gets me in the ball-park quicker ( for both exposure and contrast agent amounts).
van Huyck Photography
"Searching for the moral justification for selfishness" JK Galbraith
Start on small sizes like 4x5 and when you've got your exposure and process together, then go to larger sizes if you feel you need to.
Your biggest expense will be the palladium solution, you don't have to worry about platinum in the beginning, in fact, you don't need to ever use platinum.
Also, you can craft your digital negative to not need the NA2 contrast agent as well, again saving more money. If in fact you feel you need a hint (a drop of 2.5%), a small bottle will last a really long time
4x5 palladium prints are like little jewels, don't exclude them because of size...
Enjoyed the video. It helps that he seems like a genuinely nice guy.
Bookmarks