First attachment made with a 240mm Ronar, second made with a 135mm Sironar S. Unfortunately I do not own a macro sironar to use in the comparison. They both look good to me, the Ronar may have higher resolution, I can't think of a more three dimensional subject. Both shot at f16 at either 1/8th or 1/15th of a second. Same camera position. Outdoors so movement could be a factor but I shot a holder for each lens and have used the best exposure. Equal but minimal sharpening applied on resize to both. I dont see any reason to get a macro lens because I would be surprised if it could make much of an improvement on either. The jpegs really do not do justice to the original files but I don't have time to put up a crop.
David
Bookmarks