Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: does a color negative have the same dynamic range as a regular b&w film negative?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    789

    Re: does a color negative have the same dynamic range as a regular b&w film negative?

    ^^^ I disagree particularly if we're discussing 4x5 or larger. And "medium format" digital is still just too pricey.

  2. #12
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    8,353

    Re: does a color negative have the same dynamic range as a regular b&w film negative?

    I carry both in the field. If I need to separate something from the background and the filtration is not straight forward like say a faded reddish petroglyph against a yellow sandstone wall-my go to choice is a color negative, because I can "filter" with infinite combinations in PS. On the other hand, a traditional broad landscape that I want really dark skies works better in traditional b&w film and filters-less noise in the severly darkened sky.

    Also by shooting color negs and PS with layers and masks you can effectively use a different filter in the foreground than in the sky, avoiding problems like darkening evergreens when you are just wanting to darken the sky. You could do this with two b&w negs shot with different filters and blend them in PS, but with changing light I rarely have the freedom to shoot such in the field.

    The grain and sharpness issue is not relevant to my work as rarely print over 16x20.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    "When did photography become a desk job?" Kirk Gittings 2009

    KIRK GITTINGS
    WEBSITE

    LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    4,615

    Re: does a color negative have the same dynamic range as a regular b&w film negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by D. Bryant View Post
    C.B.,

    This very topic came up at luncheon conversation yesterday with large format photographers here locally (who BTW have many years of experience with LF and PS) and everyone at the table agreed they preferred using B&W film over color conversions (digital or analog). It was generally agreed the look of color conversions, as Oren pointed out, just looks different and good mid-tone separation is difficult at times.

    Don Bryant

    Well, Don, if I had been part of that luncheon conversation I would have offered another opinion for you misguided Georgia boys.

    There are certainly reasons to use B&W film. Given color negative film and B&W film of the same ASA the B&W will have less grain, higher resolution, longer effective dynamic range, and will cost a lot less to shoot.

    On the other hand, the ability to control tonal values with the color sliders in post processing of color negative film is a very powerful tool that in many situations trumps all of the cited pros of B&W film. And if you don't make super large prints the issue of finer grain and higher resolution of B&W film is not relevant to final print quality with LF film.

    So if you run the program you will find that there are pros and cons to both ways of working. I have done a lot of color conversion of color negative film to B&W and there is no question in my mind but that it is possible to make high quality prints that rival or equal those made with B&W film. And I am positive that with color negative film I have vastly more control of tonal values than with B&W film.

    Sandy King
    http://www.sandykingphotography.com/
    For discussion and information about carbon transfer please visit the carbon group at Yahoo.
    http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CarbronTransfer/

Similar Threads

  1. The hopeful future of film photography
    By Ed Eubanks in forum On Photography
    Replies: 414
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2011, 06:41
  2. B&W Film Dynamic Range
    By marschp in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 8-Sep-2007, 10:22
  3. New film - Rollei R3
    By Leonard Metcalf in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2-Dec-2004, 01:26
  4. Processing Tmax-100 for scanning
    By David Meddings in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-Jul-2004, 23:04
  5. Is there an on-line explanation of how CI, SBR and DR relate?
    By John D Gerndt in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 21-Apr-2004, 06:16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •