Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Photo.net

  1. #1

    Photo.net

    From the photo.net site: "Ownership of Submitted Material. All material You submit to any of our chat rooms, forums, and other public posting areas becomes the property of photo.net and may be reproduced, modified, and distributed as we see fit in any medium and for any purpose. photo.net claims no ownership rights in any image contained in any of your Photo albums. With regard to material you include in a public album, you grant a non-exclusive, world-wide, royalty free license to modify, publish and reproduce said material solely for the purpose of displaying, distributing and promoting photo.n

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    So. California
    Posts
    191

    Photo.net

    For me the answer is simple; DON'T GO THERE! Pat

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    46

    Photo.net

    Of course, photo.net DOES have a preview feature that keeps your posts from getting cut off, and that would be ni

  4. #4

    Photo.net

    What is your point, David? And what does it have to do with large format photography?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    46

    Photo.net

    Darron,

    The point is that all of the posts from members of this LF community (including everything you've written here in the past) could/would become photo.net's property, for the owners of photo.net to do with as they please (including publishing it elsewhere) if/when this forum is moved to photo.net (as is being considered).

    A lot of participants in this forum aren't particularly enthusiastic about the potential ramifications relating to this prospect.

    .......

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Posts
    1,973

    Photo.net

    ...it also prevents other people from copying what you post in the forums to other forums. Yahoo! and other portals have similar copyright ownership notices and are far more likely to use your work for their ends. If you pick up any magazine you'll see that regardless of the contributors copyright claims the entire magazine & it's contents are copyrighted as well. Any image i post on these forums has a copyright notice attached to or embedded in it. The pupose of the notification is to put the bad guys on notice. Removing the copyright notice serves as legal proof of malicious intent.

  7. #7

    Photo.net

    OK, I'll agree with you there.

    For the record, I'm one of the moderators at photo.net. I'm not as active here on the large format forum as I used to be because I sold my large format camera, but because I've been swamped trying how to make a living at motorsports photography without working endless 100 hour weeks.

    I, too, oppose moving this forum to photo.net, primarily because it would raise the noise level on this forum and lead the daily questions that are well covered in the archives. One prime example was one we had on photo.net last week. Someone thinking of getting into large format wanted to know what hazards he should be aware of before making the plunge. I pointed him to Tuan's main large format page where there is an excellent article on the pratfalls of learning large format, and other excellent articles on using large format cameras.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    46

    Photo.net

    Darron wrote,

    "I, too, oppose moving this forum to photo.net, primarily because it . . . would lead to the daily questions that are well covered in the archives. One prime example was one we had on photo.net last week. Someone thinking of getting into large format wanted to know what hazards he should be aware of before making the plunge."

    But perhaps if this page were part of photo.net he would more quickly have found through a search what he was looking for?

    I've often thought photo.net could make its opening page more welcoming for first-time visitors but no harder to navigate for regulars. In other words, make the forums a slight bit less prominent (so first-timers don't just jump in and ask oft-addressed questions) and the static content more prominent, especially distinctions between 35mm, digital, MF, LF, and perhaps videography (which I think will increasingly intersect with digital still photography).

    "If you're interested in _____, click here" kind of thing. Maybe it's already there on photo.net; newbies certainly ignore the warnings on the "Ask a new question" page telling them to do a Search first, so perhaps it can't get any more idiot-proof than it already is.

    But I think there are ways to integrate this LF page into photo.net without being inundated with inane questions. As others have noted before, photo.net's Medium-format digest is a fine example of this: that forum doesn't get nearly as many posts per week as the general photo.net forums do, and there are very few idiot questions in the MFD forum. I don't see why the LF forum couldn't function similarly there. Or am I missing something?

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    149

    Photo.net

    I thought dot-net domains were non-profit by definition. So long as they only use the forum material for "displaying, distributing and promoting photo.net" in a non-profit manner, I don't have a problem with it. If they were going to make money off my writings, I'd like to get a cut too, but somehow I don't think it very likely. You can find anything on any of the forums, free, by searching Google, so who would pay for it?

    As moderator of the Film & Processing and Printing & Finishing forums, I see Photo.net as the lesser of many evils. It seems a bit slower than Greenspun.com, but I do like the preview feature. And I like the idea of having all the best photography forums in one convenient location.

  10. #10
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,693

    Photo.net

    I think it was originally .org was for non-profit, though it has largely now become ignored - anyone can registewr as .org, although there is talk of re-enforcing this.

    basically, all sorts of commercial enterprises are registered as .com .net .org etc
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

Similar Threads

  1. OH.....MY.....GOD......my first 4x5 photo
    By Douglas Gould in forum On Photography
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 1-Mar-2012, 18:29
  2. J and C Photo
    By steve simmons in forum Resources
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 24-Nov-2003, 04:29
  3. Lowepro Photo Classic Vs. Photo AW
    By Enrique Vila in forum Gear
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-Mar-2002, 02:52
  4. photo stores/photo ops near Las Vegas?
    By Mark_437 in forum Location & Travel
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 7-Jul-2001, 21:34
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 31-Dec-1999, 22:59

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •