Tested Caltar II-N in 150mm.. Not sure i like it better than me old Xenar.. Neverless.. 4x5 Chamonix 45-n2 , Ilford @400 iso, 150mm
scan0029www by Sergei Rodionov, on Flickr
Tested Caltar II-N in 150mm.. Not sure i like it better than me old Xenar.. Neverless.. 4x5 Chamonix 45-n2 , Ilford @400 iso, 150mm
scan0029www by Sergei Rodionov, on Flickr
And another one, on lowly Angulon 90/6.8.. I am packing for trip overseas and trying to figure out lightest set of 4x5 gear (and one that i can actually FOCUS , as in - i dont want to get any f8+ lenses ).. So far it looks like 90/6.8, 150 Caltar or Xenar, and 210 Caltar + Chamonix 45-n2... I got tired of arguing with airlines that me Technika is just a camera and should not be considered as part of weight limit for carryon
scan0034-2www by Sergei Rodionov, on Flickr
PS: oops .. well.. these are kinda urban for Dallas its right next to two major highways - there were cars whooshing right behind me.. (missed topic.. was actually meaning to post them to just landscapes..)
Another one from our neighborhood park. I never get tired of it, which is good because it's only three blocks away.
Speed Graphic, Aero-Ektar.
Jonathan
Jonathan,
For what it's worth I enjoy seeing your photos and I don't think it matters how you describe how it's done or how you describe yourself. I'm a photographer and I take photos, though I've seen many from others, that where captured or made, that I like. Just semantics, me thinks.
Rick
Rick,
I completely agree; it's all semantics. If you take/make/create/formulate/fabricate/hypothesize/dream up/conjure photographs, more power to you. I don't usually think in terms of labels and am uncomfortable with them in all areas of my life, not just those related to photography. A compliment, though--no matter how expressed--is always welcome. Thanks.
Jonathan
No left turn
Thomas
Austin -- Great B&W work!
Bookmarks