Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: quality difference between enlarger lenses and other lenses

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    18

    quality difference between enlarger lenses and other lenses

    Hi, I was playing with the idee of using some lenses of my enlargers to put on m y LF camera. I haven't tryied it yet as I 'm still looking for a system to make the right ope ning speed. maybe other people already did it or know more about it.

    is the quality better or the same of enlarger lenses, (I have 50mm 85mm, and wou ld like to use them as wide angle lenses indoor) also concerning the diafragma, do you use the exact reading?

    thanks for giving me your input

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    So. California
    Posts
    191

    quality difference between enlarger lenses and other lenses

    You will find a lot of answers to this in the archives. Pat

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    377

    quality difference between enlarger lenses and other lenses

    Don't bother looking in the archives for this answer. Unless the enlarging lenses are wide angle designs (90% aren't) they will not serve as wide angle lenses. Most enlarging lenses have an acceptance angle of around 50? - the 50mm will give an image circle of around 50mm, the 85mm will cover about 90mm, when focused at infinity.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    18

    quality difference between enlarger lenses and other lenses

    thanks, how can I find the right angle of enlarger lenses? (1 of the enlarger lenses is actualy used for 6x9 enlargments, maybe it could work, not?) if there is nothing mentioned on the lens concerning ange of coveraged, how can you know the right angel?

    thanks

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Posts
    769

    quality difference between enlarger lenses and other lenses

    Enlarging lenses are designed to cover negative formats. Assuming standard designs (i.e., not wide angle etc) 50mm lenses cover a 35mm frame, 80mm lenses cover a 6x6 frame and a 150mm lens would cover a 4x5 negative (i.e., approx 162mm diagonal at a distance of 150mm from the negative). Angle of coverage can be calculated from that.

    Enlarging lenses make practical lenses to use for macro work. Remember circles of coverage increase with bellows extension at for macro work, there is a lot of extension. Enlarger lenses are also fairly well corrected for the range they are going to be used in. So if you use a 150mm enlarging lens to make a 2X macro picture of a flower, you are using the lens in the range it was designed for (try mounting the lens backwards when you get to larger than life size). You can slip enlarging lenses into a Copal 1 shutter with a simple adapter ring that is available from Calumet for approx $30-40. Good luck, DJ

Similar Threads

  1. Using enlarger lenses as barrel lenses
    By Nitish Kanabar in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 1-Apr-2005, 10:52
  2. Difference between Rodenstock Ysarex and Ysaron lenses
    By Craig Allen in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4-Oct-2004, 16:31
  3. What is the difference with lenses, ie: copal 1, APO etc...
    By David Dukeman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2001, 12:35
  4. quality of Osaka LF lenses
    By Terry G. Walsh in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 15-Sep-2000, 19:43
  5. Quality of Older 58 mm Grandagon Lenses
    By Howard Slavitt in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4-Jun-1999, 00:54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •