Please show your 6x17 pictures

[jon.oman]

Both images are very nice!

Jon

[MikeIsaak]

Lake Wakatipu sunrise near Glenorchy, New Zealand

Wow, you seem to have a lot of shots of New Zealand!
I'll be going there for a month Dec 28-Jan 26. It would be greatly appreciated if I could pick your brain about the scenic locations!

[Shailendra]

Wow, you seem to have a lot of shots of New Zealand!
I'll be going there for a month Dec 28-Jan 26. It would be greatly appreciated if I could pick your brain about the scenic locations!

Mike , sure thing...just shoot me an email...

[Ezzie]

Lake Wanaka, New Zealand Aug. 2010

Holy guacamole. You´ve done it again. I´m in awe of your panoramas.

[MIke Sherck]

For those of you shooting color 6x17, where do you go for prints (either from negatives or transparencies)? In general terms, what does it cost you for prints?

Thanks!

Mike

[Jan Pedersen]

Ralph,
Since the thread now is 10 pages long and the title is 6x17 pictures, would it be possible to move it to the lounge?

Thanks.
jan

[SocalAstro]

Jan,

This thread used to be in the lounge originally. It was moved here and the rules changed somehow.

I suppose there's always the "safe haven for tiny formats" thread in one of the other sub-forums :-)

Cheers,
Leon

Ralph,
Since the thread now is 10 pages long and the title is 6x17 pictures, would it be possible to move it to the lounge?

Thanks.
jan

[Joe Forks]

I agree, put those posts back and move it to the lounge, especially if that's where it was to begin with. There are other fotoman and the like posts in this thread, let's be fair to everyone.

[onnect17]

The moderators should be embarrassed by their existing definition of what constitutes large format...

Van, I totally agree. I think the moderators step over the line with the delete button.
Only an "idiota" can deny some overlap between formats.
Perhaps they are able to tell me what camera I used for this shot

Armando Vergara
Newton, MA

[Lachlan 717]

The moderators should be embarrassed by their existing definition of what constitutes large format. Who ever heard of a double standard like this (617 size is large format, but only with the right type of camera)?

I, too, agree with Van Camper's principle on this (although not the expression; can't have me agreeing to too much, Van Camper!!)

It seems that a stand on either size OR type of camera is fraught with danger.

After all, you can get a P&S Fotoman (45PS) that will qualify as LF here, but the 6x17 won't.

And a 624 Gaoersi has a greater film area than a 4x5, but, as a P&S design, does not qualify.

Perhaps the Moderators should have just left sleeping dogs to lie here. These 6x17 images were not hurting anyone, even the more priggish Members if we're truly honest with ourselves.

I think that we've lost some striking images that could have assisted people using 4x10, 5x12, 7x17, 8x20 et al...