Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 149

Thread: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

  1. #121
    Joanna Carter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Plestin-les-Grèves, France
    Posts
    989

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Quote Originally Posted by Rider View Post
    When did Fuji bail? I thought they still made Quickloads
    They do, it's only Acros that they have stopped selling in QL, but not in loose sheet.
    Joanna Carter
    Grandes Images

    UKLFPG

  2. #122

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    271

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    I am interested in 8x10 if at all possible. The holders are expensive and to heavy to carry adequate amounts in the field.


    _ .. --
    TiM

  3. #123
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,150

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    I too would be interested in an 8x10 envelope system.

  4. #124

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Stevens Point, WI
    Posts
    1,553

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    I'm in for both 4x5 and 8x10. Especially 8x10 where the weight (and space) advantage would be amplified.

  5. #125
    joseph
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Am I missing something?

    Does the holder for 8x10 packets already exist?

  6. #126

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austin TX
    Posts
    2,049

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Quote Originally Posted by jb7 View Post
    Am I missing something?

    Does the holder for 8x10 packets already exist?
    No, but many are hoping that if Joanna could get something functioning for say 4X5 it might be extendable to other formats. Of course larger formats will be more difficult due to film flatness considerations once the sleeve is removed. I'm guessing that she would like to make something compatible with the existing 4X5 QL back first.

    Nate Potter, Austin TX.

  7. #127
    joseph
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Thanks Nate-

    now there's a design challenge...

  8. #128

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    789

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Any update as to if/when this will come to fruition? Also, there is still no plan to produce larger (5x7 and/or 8x10) holders and packet systems, right?

  9. #129
    LJ Segil
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    619

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Oh please, let's have larger formats available! I would think that some of our LF innovators (such as Ritter, Canham or Wehman just to toss around a few people who come readily to mind) could work cooperatively to scale up the technology needed to develop envelopes and holders for larger formats. Sweet dreams.
    Larry

  10. #130

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1

    Re: New Envelope System for Quickload, ReadyLoad and Polaroid Holders

    Joanna,

    Let me start by thanking you for the effort.
    I've only recently gotten into LF and it seems that every time I become aware of something cool the manufacturer is it killing off; I've become increasingly frustrated. I only found out today that Fujifilm killed the Acros QLs. I was going to stock up for a trip I'm taking in two weeks only to find that no one is carrying anymore! And I just bought a box in July! Now I need to reconsider my whole packing effort, Omaha to San Francisco with a fat stack of Riteway film holders. Hauling it all to the top of Lombard Street isn't exactly hiking through the hills/mountains - but it's still a bit of a hump nevertheless.
    It's encouraging to see that other people are sufficiently frustrated that they are working on a solution.

    I'm sure you know what my next line is, the (tired?) refrain: when?
    I, for one, wouldn't mind beta testing a system. And I'm happy to sign an NDA to protect your sweat equity. I am _imminently_ more interested in a solution.


    rish

Similar Threads

  1. Problem with Kodak E100g Readyload in Polaroid 545
    By Duncan Dwelle in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-Jan-2005, 03:13
  2. film loading/unloading
    By Barret in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2-Aug-2004, 12:24
  3. Readyload vs Polaroid film holder
    By Chris Werner in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22-Jun-2000, 15:29

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •