i have no idea who these people are but im sure they use digital as a part of there inkjet process
as long as they dont misrepresent in the sale of there inkjets
...What Paul says.
and frankly, I'd say that your example of a straight, uncropped, unmanipulated (i take it you're using an emulsion that has a linear characteristic curve, and that when you developed it, there was no modification of that curve by the chemistry), color (haven't seen much b/w in the real world), no UV filter in front of the lens, is not only an extreme minority.. but i'd suspect a rather uninteresting one (except perhaps for journalistic work). I'd bet there isn't a single photographic image of any significance that has not been manipulated.
In your part of the world is there there any actual law or case history excluding ink prints from photography?
If so, it's your duty as a citizen to report the H+F Collection at the Huis Marseille Foundation for photography in Amsterdam, and the Nederlands Fotomuseum in Rotterdam.
They're lying to everyone!
are they being sold as inkjets or photos?
if they are breaking the sale of goods act they could well be open to prosecution
From the Miriam Webster Dictionary:
Main Entry:
pho·tog·ra·phy
Pronunciation:
\fə-ˈtä-grə-fē\
Function:
noun
Date:
1839
: the art or process of producing images by the action of radiant energy and especially light on a sensitive surface (as film or a CCD chip)
Main Entry:
1pho·to·graph
Pronunciation:
\ˈfō-tə-ˌgraf\
Function:
noun
Date:
1839
: a picture or likeness obtained by photography
Pablo, you are arguing in whats called circular reasoning in logic.Go take a basic logic course at your local community college, and then come back to argue
i think its called blinded by technology
happy inkjetting
Thanks!
Happy bullshitting!
In those cases, photographs (even though some are captured digitally), under a variety of names.. archival pigment print seems to be the most common.
But why not start with me... since I start with a digital photograph, print a negative with an inkjet printer, and contact that onto Platinum... That has to be the most dishonest of all from your perspective. I sell platinum prints of photographs (there... i've even admitted it on a public forum.. you can use that as evidence of my wrong-doing). I sell (and have sold) 11x14 prints for $550 US, and a number of 16x20 prints at $700 US. I've even sold some in Europe
Bookmarks