Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: offical weight of the following lens

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    offical weight of the following lens

    The lens chart on the front page is a very complete table, but it misses some information (weight of the following lens)
    Grandgon N 200mm
    Apo Ronar 240mm 300mm 360mm 480mm
    Anyone knows these information?
    I think I got the apo sironar w's weight 380g for 150mm
    Also, does anyone have lens information of caltar-IIE 150 and 210.

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,650

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    The following specifications, as provided by the Rodenstock distributor in Japan, are from the 1995 Nippon Camera Annual:

    Apo-Ronar 240mm in Copal 1: 246 g
    Apo-Ronar 300mm in Copal 1: 252 g
    Apo-Ronar 360mm in Copal 3: 580 g
    Apo-Ronar 480mm in Copal 3: 850 g

    Grandagon-N 200mm in Copal 3: 2650 g

    Unfortunately, the listing doesn't include the Geronars (Caltar II-E).

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    Quote Originally Posted by Oren Grad View Post
    The following specifications, as provided by the Rodenstock distributor in Japan, are from the 1995 Nippon Camera Annual:

    Apo-Ronar 240mm in Copal 1: 246 g
    Apo-Ronar 300mm in Copal 1: 252 g
    Apo-Ronar 360mm in Copal 3: 580 g
    Apo-Ronar 480mm in Copal 3: 850 g

    Grandagon-N 200mm in Copal 3: 2650 g

    Unfortunately, the listing doesn't include the Geronars (Caltar II-E).

    Thanks Oren, I can fill in these information now.

  4. #4
    the Docter is in Arne Croell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    1,210

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    Note that older Apo-Ronars had brass mounts whereas later ones used aluminum alloy. That accounts for some weight difference for the same lens. Off the top of my head, the change would have been sometime around the late 1980's. Orens numbers are the aluminum mount versions. As an example, the brass version of the 300mm Apo-Ronar is 60g heavier than the aluminum one.

  5. #5
    SF Bay Area 94303
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    433

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    I hate when the lense is way too heavy

    Grandagon-N 200mm in Copal 3: 2650 g

    That is about 5 pounds. Yikes.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,650

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    5.8 pounds, actually. Forklift material.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    Has anyone compare the grandagon 200 (2650g), SA 210 (3065g) and SSXL 210 (2002g) side by side?

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Frankfurt, Germany
    Posts
    130

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    the super angulon 8/210 that i hat weighted 2,3 kg. with compur shutter. i think that just the latest mc super angulons were more than 3 kg.

  9. #9
    runs a monkey grinder Steve M Hostetter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Beech Grove Indiana
    Posts
    2,293

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    I have owned the Schneider 210mm f8 super angulon and the 210mm f5.6 super symmar and the 210mm super symmar is the sharpest of those two lenses by a very noticable amount

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963

    Re: offical weight of the following lens

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M Hostetter View Post
    I have owned the Schneider 210mm f8 super angulon and the 210mm f5.6 super symmar and the 210mm super symmar is the sharpest of those two lenses by a very noticable amount
    and yet 210 super symmar xl is the lightest of all three. Thanks to the new design and technology.
    I remember back in college, one of my friend had a 28~200 zoom , it is so damn heavy that the mount on the camera were broken. 28~200 zoom lens now are much lighter.

Similar Threads

  1. Trousse Parisienne Casket Lens Set
    By John Downie in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 14-Jun-2014, 18:32
  2. 4x5 Ultra Fine Focusing and Calibration
    By rvhalejr in forum New Products and Services
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 11-Dec-2009, 18:26
  3. 1850-1860 R. Walzl of Baltimore Lens
    By tom thomas in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Jan-2008, 14:18
  4. Whole Plate Wide Angle Lens Of Choice in the Schneider XL Lineup
    By audioexcels in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 15-Dec-2007, 22:29
  5. Portrait perspective: Quiz and two questions
    By Jerry Fusselman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 5-Jun-2006, 17:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •