Originally Posted by
jb7
I'm using a Macbook pro,
so the images are only about 5" wide-
I did have a look in Photoshop, looked at the pixels,
and there does seem to be a very marginal difference in favour of the detail pic on the left-
However, there are a few observations-
You've saved these as jpegs, and they're lossy-
as they're greyscale, maybe it would be better to compare gifs,
which would save each pixel individually,
and aren't compressed-
I was a little surprised by the blacks being 100% black, for some reason-
I suppose I didn't expect them to be clipped as much-
I presume these were post processed to some extent?
I suppose it would depend on the comparative trouble to wet mount-
and how many you'd have to do, but in answer to your query,
I'd say that the difference is probably not appreciable enough, to me,
from looking at these details on a monitor-
perhaps the difference might be more apparent in a print...
joseph
Bookmarks