I've read every thread I can find on this ... Epson vs. Epson ... Microtek, Nikon etc. vs. Epson ... but haven't found what I need to know: I'm an average new LF shooter (4x5 up to 8x10) and would like to have a capable scanner for negatives. In the 4x5 to 8x10 range ... is there a large enough difference between the Epson 4990 ($198), 700 ($415), and 750 ($600) to warrant the extra $$ for the newer scanners. The largest prints I do are 16x20.
Bookmarks