Rolleiflex 2.8 D Planar, PanF, Perceptol
Rolleiflex 2.8 D Planar, PanF, Perceptol
I assume you did not use any of the disk? Also what aperture? We're you in the soft focus range....?Originally Posted by Jay DeFehr
I have that lens too and haven't use it on people, hence the ????
Was the first shot also the 150? I thought it looked wider on account of rendering of her hand on her shoulder.
Thanks for answering!!
WOW! WHat is PanF?Rolleiflex 2.8 D Planar, PanF, Perceptol
Thanks...Ilford PANF 50 (120 roll film)
Yes, no disc, f/4, all shots. This is our first try with this lens, too. So far, I really like it.
It's a beauty! So at f4 you were wide open, the soft focus is there, very subtly and creates that smooth creamy classic feel.
Nice!
/gth
Rolleiflex 3.5F Planar, T-Max 100
Jonathan
Yes, that's maximum diffusion, but mitigated somewhat by the hard light, sharp film, and acutance developer. Taken together, I like the look, and I can shoot wide open (f/4 is not terribly fast) and don't need to worry about stopping down to focus. I was worried about that, as it sort of defeats the quickness of an SLR if one has to do a lot of fidgeting while focusing. I'm about to have another go, this time with Pan F+. Never again with that Adox!
A relative gave me this old negative from 1942 to scan for them (she is the near one in the picture). It's dimensions are 3¼ x 5½ inches which I think is 122 postcard film but I'm not sure. I asked what camera but she didn't know.
Tuco,
It looks more square than postcard -- is it cropped? It's a much better scan than I've been able to get from old negatives.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks