It has been recommended that I use a G-Claron 210 as a macro lens for macro work. (4 x 5)
Is that more of a stop-gap measure for people until they decide to buy a better macro lens, or is it truly extraordinary?
I was thinking about getting the Apo-Macro ROdenstock, or perhaps the Schneider Macro lens. Of course these are far more expensive.
WHat do you all think?
Thanks,
Michael
Bookmarks